explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,198
Precious metals, you think so?? Those who own Silver don't share your view, it's been tanking it the last 2 weeks, perhaps a precurser to a move in Gold??
As for the Fed giving another rate cut, it will supply only limited fuel for another rally, the Fed was played most of it's cards already from 2000-2003 and has limited space to manoevre. Can they bring back the bubble again?? IMO investors will very cautious this time round.
After the Nikkei started to tank in 1990 the BOJ tried similar tactics effectively taking their rates to almost zero (they may as well have handed out yen), what did that do for the Nikkei??
Again the short term continues to plague discussions. In 2002 silver was at US$4 an ounce, today it sits as we speak at US$11.90 an ounze and from a technical perspective is still in a strong uptrend. The US dollar index inversely mirrors this from $1.20 to just a shade above .80 today. I know what I would back long and which I would short. My own fundamental view supports my technical check, but that's my slant you need to follow your own.
I personally know family and friends who have borrowed to the hilt for their bit of Aussie property and the BMW, beyond redemptive value. Some have a number of investment properties in the same boat. Any rise in interest rates, fuel and food is going to take them out.
As for the Fed giving another rate cut, it will supply only limited fuel for another rally, the Fed was played most of it's cards already from 2000-2003 and has limited space to manoevre. Can they bring back the bubble again?? IMO investors will very cautious this time round.
After the Nikkei started to tank in 1990 the BOJ tried similar tactics effectively taking their rates to almost zero (they may as well have handed out yen), what did that do for the Nikkei??
Good points wavepicker, remember what happened last time round when the Fed started cutting rates? From the chart below you can see the rally was short-lived. Not saying that this time will be the same but just something to bear in mind. (no pun intended)
Incorrect.ok so money is becoming more expensive to borrow that doesn't mean that it won't be available.
I have a scenario for which i would like opinion please.
Say we have company/ private investment fund A: cash loaded with businesses that already make money and looking to aquire new investments
Company B: a smaller but still profitable company
Does it really matter if company A buys company B is there really that much value added. if company A can't make company B more efficient then realistically it doesn't matter if A and B continue to be separate entites.
Again the short term continues to plague discussions. In 2002 silver was at US$4 an ounce, today it sits as we speak at US$11.90 an ounze and from a technical perspective is still in a strong uptrend. The US dollar index inversely mirrors this from $1.20 to just a shade above .80 today. I know what I would back long and which I would short. My own fundamental view supports my technical check, but that's my slant you need to follow your own.
It will be a good thing, but will probably cause what is oxymoronically known as negative growth for a time. i.e. recessionhang on you just said it wont be available but what you are really saying is it will only be available to people or companys who are no considered risky investments. How can that be a bad thing.
And effect -TOKYO (AP) - An official at Japan's central bank said Thursday low Japanese interest rates may have contributed to global market jitters stemming from U.S. credit problems.
In a speech to business leaders in Kofu, west of Tokyo, Bank of Japan policy board member Atsushi Mizuno also said the country's low interest rates may have worsened volatility in the foreign exchange market, Dow Jones Newswires reported.
"Recent turmoil in the financial markets proves that keeping rates that aren't in line with economic fundamentals could lead to risks of destabilizing financial markets," Mizuno was quoted saying.
Mizuno, considered a hawkish board member, said the recent credit market crisis was caused by a mix of factors, including Japan's low interest rates.
Another acronym to learn & study - structured investment vehicle (SIV).A $US6.6 billion ($8.16 billion) investment vehicle run by Cheyne Capital, a London hedge fund, yesterday became the latest victim of the crisis in short-term lending markets when it told investors it had breached funding restrictions, forcing an eventual wind-down.
hang on you just said it wont be available but what you are really saying is it will only be available to people or companys who are no considered risky investments. How can that be a bad thing.
This is starting to mean large exposure.Just because investment banks have some limited exposure to dodgy loans doesn't bring down the whole house.
It will be a good thing, but will probably cause what is oxymoronically known as negative growth for a time. i.e. recession
KK, just because a debt is securitised it doesn't mean there are no ongoing funding obligations. As credit becomes more difficult to obtain, the cost of that credit becomes greater - and with such wafer thin profit margins on mortgages already** , a small increase in the cost of funding can cause a dramatic effect on products & services being offered to the market.Just because investment banks have some limited exposure to dodgy loans doesn't bring down the whole house. 90% of loans are still very servicable. In conjunction with that the comodity boom isn't really effected by US cnsumers.
Wow, what a revelation!** The top 20% of profitable customers at the 4 major banks contribute approx 130% of their profits. Think about it. That makes 80% of bank customers unprofitable loss leaders. The vast majority of fixed rate loans sold by deposit holding organisations are running at a loss, as fixed rate loan are hard to break & offer opportunities for cross selling, and yes deposit holding organisations will also feel the effects of the credit squeeze - which is why Adelaide Bank is one of 4 lenders to increase rates independant of reserve bank rate movements.
** The top 20% of profitable customers at the 4 major banks contribute approx 130% of their profits. Think about it. That makes 80% of bank customers unprofitable loss leaders. The vast majority of fixed rate loans sold by deposit holding organisations are running at a loss, as fixed rate loan are hard to break & offer opportunities for cross selling, and yes deposit holding organisations will also feel the effects of the credit squeeze - which is why Adelaide Bank is one of 4 lenders to increase rates independant of reserve bank rate movements.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?