This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Coronavirus (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) outbreak discussion

Will the "Corona Virus" turn into a worldwide epidemic or fizzle out?

  • Yes

    Votes: 37 49.3%
  • No

    Votes: 9 12.0%
  • Bigger than SARS, but not worldwide epidemic (Black Death/bubonic plague)

    Votes: 25 33.3%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 4 5.3%

  • Total voters
    75
I actually don't read the Guardian much, not because I dislike it, just it isn't on my newspaper watch list, I have the age, SMH, ABC, telegraph, courier mail and the west australian. But really I can only read the age, SMH and ABC the others have too hard a paywall. The others I read are overseas papers when checking out stories they seem pretty easy to access.
The Guardian articles were only a result of googling experts disagree with Morrison news, then AZ to be available to all news. It just showed how the narrative does a 180, yet they don't correct earlier accusations, it isn't party specific, if labor were in The Australian would be doing the same thing.
 
Love that idea, but it might be too hard unfortunately. Media businesses only create news to make advertising money so they can’t bite the hand that feeds them. What I have noticed is that Covid news that could be seen as negative to the current narrative is available for a short time only and then it disappears, particularly news about India and China.
 
Interesting article, it shows how prevalent vaccine hesitancy is when only 43% of aged care workers have taken up the vaccine.
I wonder if the SPC directive to employees, to be vaccinated, will be challenged in the court system?
From the article:

Aged Care workers have until September 17 to have at least one dose of a Covid vaccine to be allowed to work. More than 43 per cent have received their first jab.

The Prime Minister said it would be up to the courts to decide whether it is reasonable for retail, supermarket and other essential services to make jabs mandatory.

"Employers need to consider those matters very carefully if they are looking to make directions of that nature," he said.

The reassurance comes after SPC became the first non-health-related business to ban employees unless they are fully vaccinated for Covid-19.

The mandate will be effective from the end of November, the company announced on Thursday.
 
I wonder if the SPC directive to employees, to be vaccinated, will be challenged in the court system?

Possibly but think of the other side of the coin. Employee contracts Covid and lands the company with a law suit.

And have a read of this High Court decision. Would not surprise me if elements of paragrah 2 of the decision to "give any other direction that the authorised officer considers is reasonably necessary to protect public health" could also extend to other directives on public health.

 
That is exactly what courts are for, to weigh up the probabilities and come to a judgement of what is considered in the public interest.
Lots of things should be tested in court, to get rid of the grey areas that persist because a judgement isn't made, or the issue is settled out of court and the issue remains unresolved.
 
We all seek answers to these dreaded lockdowns and how to crawl out back to normalcy.
Here is yet another scientist who has pleaded with our health professionals, the prime minister, ABC, media outlets etc. alerting them to an easy, fast and low cost way to end it.
He explains how misinformation has been spread, how simple drugs have been effective and how these things have been known and used for a very long time. He speaks about intravenous Vit C of which Wuhan imported 50 tons before getting control of the virus among other products, and is frustrated by the censorship and that the medical leaders do not want to upset the big pharma companies. He maintains that our political leaders have no idea at all about what should be done.

The more people realise that these things are the real problem, that Covid should not be the problem it is, that vaccines are a very poor answer the faster we will get out of this mess and economies back on track and our personal freedoms expanded without restriction.
 
How about employee forced to have vax and gets blood clots then sues company?
That's exactly what I'm talking about, it is o.k saying you will do this and you will do that, but until it has been tested in court it is just a BS wish list.
If a company can demand a worker has a vaccine, where do you draw the line? I hope the unions actually challenge it, they can make it a condition of new employees (maybe), but it wasn't a condition of employment for current employees. Retrospective conditions of employment, is like any other retrospective laws or rules, those who it affects have to agree to it.
Like I said unless it is challenged, it by de facto becomes acceptable and becomes a grey area, where the company decides what is in the publics best interests over the workers rights.
 
Last edited:
As long as we have a choice.....
 
Terry Mcrann in Weekend OZ
Watch the state premiers start lining up demanding that the feds provide income support for the workers that they themselves have crunched.
Mick
 
The problem is that all of the orgs that oversee and monitor the workers righta are already in Lockstep nwith the government.
According to the Fair work ombudsman,

The very first sentence seems to suggest that employers cannot force employees to be vaccinated, but then goes on to undermine in the next section..
Certainly in the case of governments, the precedent has been set. Even before the pandemic started, anyone going to work in a nursing
home had to have had a flu injection.
Safework Australia highlights the duty of care that employers have to provide a safe working environment for employees".

I don't like the chances of any legal challenge working. A legal challenge ahs already been dismissed in the High Court in reltion to lockdowns and the abuse of basic human rights.
Mick
 
And Finally, the police state has arrived.
I never thought I would see the day when any Government, much less a so called liberal one, would demand people carry their papers.
From the NSW Government Website
How long will it before its permanent.
Mick
 

It's clearly short term and straightforward.
Under the current public health laws to minimise movement if people leave their home for specified reasons they have to stay with a certain radius. So in these circumstances clearly police do need to know where your home is.


 
Australian passport holders can no longer pass freely in and out of Australia, only country in the world has done this (Maybe China too) is the Liberal / National party now the same or worse than the CCP
 
Australian passport holders can no longer pass freely in and out of Australia, only country in the world has done this (Maybe China too) is the Liberal / National party now the same or worse than the CCP
If not, it's certainly heading that way. A change if g'mint won't change that either unless we vote away from the majors.

We need to vote for more liberal parties (in the true liberal sense, not as in the Liberal party of Australia).
 

It's a good one there. I think some industries already have the right to require employees have a vaccination. Flu vaccinations for example in hospitals and other similar industries.
 
Don't vote, it just encourages them haha.

Politicians have to be political, watch their backs, do favours, not upset the press, keep party members happy, hand out freebies to battlers, businesses, investors, etc. to keep the backers happy, do anything to increase their margins and their cashflow and try to give direction to the country or state.

It is a new world now where they can print money too.

Looking after our interests has got to be low on the list of todos but looking as if they do is probably high on the list. Spin doctors are essential assets.

All we can do is keep the Westminster style system alive which I think is our best protection. That came out after the 1999 vote to change our constitution and become a republic. It is far from perfect, but more stable than the governments of most countries.
 
It's a good one there. I think some industries already have the right to require employees have a vaccination. Flu vaccinations for example in hospitals and other similar industries.
I'm not sure that is accurate, as a lot of hospital staff weren't vaccinated for covid and I'm sure it would have been demanded if an instruction already existed.

Also I thought the first cab off the rank on compulsory vaccinations, were aged care facilities and that comes into effect in September.
I could be wrong.

It is just my understanding, but I thought the article posted a few days back said that SPC was the first private company to adopt compulsory vaccinations, maybe you could post up where compulsory vaccinations are already a pre requisite at some work places.
 
Last edited:
Australian passport holders can no longer pass freely in and out of Australia, only country in the world has done this (Maybe China too) is the Liberal / National party now the same or worse than the CCP
I wasn't meaning the normal Australian passport, more the passport app that will probably be linked to your medicare and my gov account.

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/nhs-app-covid-vaccine-passport

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...