- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,755
- Reactions
- 24,731
I actually don't read the Guardian much, not because I dislike it, just it isn't on my newspaper watch list, I have the age, SMH, ABC, telegraph, courier mail and the west australian. But really I can only read the age, SMH and ABC the others have too hard a paywall. The others I read are overseas papers when checking out stories they seem pretty easy to access.sp a Guardian fan now, I'd never have believed it !
I agree with your thoughts though, although I doubt if most media could survive without advertisers/taxpayers.
What they need to do more is have all the media outlets fact check each other a la Media Watch. That would certainly be entertaining and would help keep all of them on their toes.
Love that idea, but it might be too hard unfortunately. Media businesses only create news to make advertising money so they can’t bite the hand that feeds them. What I have noticed is that Covid news that could be seen as negative to the current narrative is available for a short time only and then it disappears, particularly news about India and China.sp a Guardian fan now, I'd never have believed it !
I agree with your thoughts though, although I doubt if most media could survive without advertisers/taxpayers.
What they need to do more is have all the media outlets fact check each other a la Media Watch. That would certainly be entertaining and would help keep all of them on their toes.
I wonder if the SPC directive to employees, to be vaccinated, will be challenged in the court system?
That is exactly what courts are for, to weigh up the probabilities and come to a judgement of what is considered in the public interest.Possibly but think of the other side of the coin. Employee contracts Covid and lands the company with a law suit.
And have a read of this High Court decision. Would not surprise me if elements of paragrah 2 of the decision to "give any other direction that the authorised officer considers is reasonably necessary to protect public health" could also extend to other directives on public health.
That's exactly what I'm talking about, it is o.k saying you will do this and you will do that, but until it has been tested in court it is just a BS wish list.How about employee forced to have vax and gets blood clots then sues company?
As long as we have a choice.....In a lot of ways, it is what it is, if the whole thing is a hoax it really doesn't matter, what matters is what you personally think is the right choice for you.
That boils down to a lot of things, age, health, aspirations, travel plans, travel hopes, work requirements, personal beliefs, religious beliefs etc, there isn't one size fits all in this.
Watch the state premiers start lining up demanding that the feds provide income support for the workers that they themselves have crunched.The latest Roy Morgan jobs numbers will show that 28,000 people lost their jobs as the lockdowns in Victoria (the previous one) and NSW started to bite through July.
This took the Morgan measure of the number of jobless across Australia to 1.42m.
A further 1.33m were under-employed, meaning a staggering total of more than 2.7m Australians were either out of a job or working short hours. That’s nearly one in every five workers.
These numbers are also before the full impact of the NSW lockdown has played out and of course before the latest Victorian and Queensland lockdowns.
Back in March last year when the first national lockdown was imposed – and before the federal government had introduced the original JobKeeper – more than one in every four workers were either out of work or working short hours.
We won’t get the official ABS jobs data for July for another two weeks, and the way they do the data it will only be for the first two weeks of July – well before the NSW lockdown in particular had really started to bite. The Morgan numbers measure through the month.
The last ABS numbers had the jobless rate at just 4.9 per cent for (the first two weeks of) June. Morgan tells us it’s now really double that at 9.7 per cent.
The last ABS numbers had the jobless and underemployment rate at 12.8 per cent for June. Morgan says it is now 18.8 per cent in July.
More telling, it’s clearly got worse, much worse, than even the Morgan numbers indicate as the NSW lockdown will now run through August at least and has been joined by the new Victorian lockdown and the one in south-east Queensland.
Right now nearly three-quarters of the entire national economy is in lockdown and hurting jobs and businesses not only in the states directly impacted but across Australia.
The problem is that all of the orgs that oversee and monitor the workers righta are already in Lockstep nwith the government.That's exactly what I'm talking about, it is o.k saying you will do this and you will do that, but until it has been tested in court it is just a BS wish list.
If a company can demand a worker has a vaccine, where do you draw the line? I hope the unions actually challenge it, they can make it a condition of new employees (maybe), but it wasn't a condition of employment for current employees. Retrospective conditions of employment, is like any other retrospective laws or rules, those who it affects have to agree to it.
Like I said unless it is challenged, it by de facto becomes acceptable and becomes a grey area, where the company decides what is in the publics best interests over the workers rights.
The very first sentence seems to suggest that employers cannot force employees to be vaccinated, but then goes on to undermine in the next section..In the current circumstances, the overwhelming majority of employers should assume that they can’t require their employees to be vaccinated against coronavirus.
While the Australian Government’s policy is that receiving a vaccination is voluntary, it aims to have as many Australians vaccinated as possible.
There are limited circumstances where an employer may require their employees to be vaccinated. Whether an employer can require their employees to be vaccinated against coronavirus is highly fact dependent, taking account of the workplace and each employee’s circumstances. Relevant factors an employer should consider include:
Further considerations may include whether employees have a legitimate reason for not being vaccinated (for example, a medical reason), and how protections for employees under anti-discrimination laws may apply. Learn more at How does a vaccination requirement interact with anti-discrimination laws?
- whether a specific law (such as a state or territory public health law) requires an employee to be vaccinated (see Legislation and public health orders requiring vaccination against coronavirus)
- whether an enterprise agreement, other registered agreement or employment contract includes a provision about requiring vaccinations
- if no law, agreement or employment contract applies that requires vaccination, whether it would be lawful and reasonable for an employer to give their employees a direction to be vaccinated (which is assessed on a case by case basis).
We have included more information on these issues below.
Employers should get their own legal advice if:
- they’re considering making coronavirus vaccinations mandatory in their workplace, or
- they operate in a coronavirus high-risk environment (for example, health care or meat processing).
Legislation and public health orders requiring vaccination against coronavirus
State and territory governments may make public health orders requiring the vaccination of workers (for example, in identified high-risk workplaces or industries) in their state or territory. Employers and workers need to comply with any public health orders that apply to them.
I don't like the chances of any legal challenge working. A legal challenge ahs already been dismissed in the High Court in reltion to lockdowns and the abuse of basic human rights.On 28 June 2021, the National Cabinet agreed that COVID-19 vaccinations are to be mandated for residential aged care workers as a condition of working in an aged care facility through shared state, territory and Commonwealth authorities and compliance measures. For further information, go to the National Cabinet Media Statement.
Queensland has issued a public health direction for health workers working with diagnosed cases of COVID-19. For a link to Queensland’s public health directions go to our public health orders page.
Western Australia has issued a public health direction for quarantine centre workers. For a link to Western Australia’s public health directions go to our public health orders page.
New South Wales has issued a public health direction for airport and quarantine workers.
How long will it before its permanent.Proof of address
You must carry proof of your address if you
You must show your proof of address if asked by the NSW Police.
- have left your home for a reasonable excuse
- are exercising outdoors or have left your home for recreation, or
- have a reasonable excuse and are leaving Greater Sydney including the Blue Mountains, Central Coast, Wollongong and Shellharbour local government areas.
And Finally, the police state has arrived.
I never thought I would see the day when any Government, much less a so called liberal one, would demand people carry their papers.
From the NSW Government Website
How long will it before its permanent.
Mick
My guess, when they have the vaccine passport.How long will it before its permanent.
Mick
If not, it's certainly heading that way. A change if g'mint won't change that either unless we vote away from the majors.Australian passport holders can no longer pass freely in and out of Australia, only country in the world has done this (Maybe China too) is the Liberal / National party now the same or worse than the CCP
That's exactly what I'm talking about, it is o.k saying you will do this and you will do that, but until it has been tested in court it is just a BS wish list.
If a company can demand a worker has a vaccine, where do you draw the line? I hope the unions actually challenge it, they can make it a condition of new employees (maybe), but it wasn't a condition of employment for current employees. Retrospective conditions of employment, is like any other retrospective laws or rules, those who it affects have to agree to it.
Like I said unless it is challenged, it by de facto becomes acceptable and becomes a grey area, where the company decides what is in the publics best interests over the workers rights.
I'm not sure that is accurate, as a lot of hospital staff weren't vaccinated for covid and I'm sure it would have been demanded if an instruction already existed.It's a good one there. I think some industries already have the right to require employees have a vaccination. Flu vaccinations for example in hospitals and other similar industries.
I wasn't meaning the normal Australian passport, more the passport app that will probably be linked to your medicare and my gov account.Australian passport holders can no longer pass freely in and out of Australia, only country in the world has done this (Maybe China too) is the Liberal / National party now the same or worse than the CCP
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?