Religious Affairs Minister Mohammad Ejaz-ul-Haq, son of the late military president Mohammad Zia-ul-Haq, told the assembly that if someone committed a suicide bombing to protect the honour of the Prophet Mohammad, his act was justified.
That is justified of course, as is death to Rushdi for writing something that made the Prophet look uncool.From the following article it is clear what the intent of Islamic fundamentalism is. These fools are getting weirder everyday.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21948708-5006003,00.html
That is justified of course, as is death to Rushdi for writing something that made the Prophet look uncool.
Of course!!!!! It's the future of human morals. The only way we can have some justice, and live in peace and harmony. I want peoples hands cut off for stealing too! And, I would have loved to have been able to say, 'I divorce you, I divorce you, I divorce you', to get rid of my 1st wife. Is that clear enough?Do you support their stance on this Kennas? The death of Rushdie? Suicide bombing?
Of course!!!!! It's the future of human morals. The only way we can have some justice, and live in peace and harmony. I want peoples hands cut off for stealing too! And, I would have loved to have been able to say, 'I divorce you, I divorce you, I divorce you', to get rid of my 1st wife. Is that clear enough?
Of course!!!!! It's the future of human morals. The only way we can have some justice, and live in peace and harmony. I want peoples hands cut off for stealing too! And, I would have loved to have been able to say, 'I divorce you, I divorce you, I divorce you', to get rid of my 1st wife. Is that clear enough?
It's no different to the innocent Iraq folk who have been caught up in the "coalitition of the willing." It's just that the innocent Iraq folk weren't the main target. The result is still the same. The US, UK and Australians, amongst others, considered a certain number of Iraq nationals' deaths to be acceptable before chasing their weapons of non existance.Do you support their stance on this Kennas? The death of Rushdie? Suicide bombing?
It's no different to the innocent Iraq folk who have been caught up in the "coalitition of the willing." It's just that the innocent Iraq folk weren't the main target. The result is still the same. The US, UK and Australians, amongst others, considered a certain number of Iraq nationals' deaths to be acceptable before chasing their weapons of non existance.
It's all death by slaughter. Does it really matter how one dresses it?
don't be a muppet. by far the largest amount of innocent iraqi deaths have been at the hands of fellow muslims. while some iraqis have been killed during the occupation by the coalition, the bulk have been murdered by fellow muslim arabs.
and weapons of mass destruction DO exist, they are currently in syria. the coalition knew they existed because the coalition sold them to saddam and they were used against kurds in the north and shia arabs in the south.
islam needs a reformation and fundamentalists need a good kick up the ass (which they are getting to some extent - mujahadeen are butchered in record numbers, no great loss)
Oddly enough the majority of innocent deaths of civilians in the USA are by Christians.don't be a muppet. by far the largest amount of innocent iraqi deaths have been at the hands of fellow muslims. while some iraqis have been killed during the occupation by the coalition, the bulk have been murdered by fellow muslim arabs.
mujahadeen are butchered in record numbers, no great loss)
disarray...
1. and weapons of mass destruction DO exist, they are currently in syria.
2. the coalition knew they existed because the coalition sold them to saddam and they were used against kurds in the north and shia arabs in the south.
3. mujahadeen are butchered in record numbers, no great loss
as I said above, maybe you should stop generalising there disarrayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambo_III
The film depicts Rambo (Sylvester Stallone) on a mission to Afghanistan. Colonel Trautman (Richard Crenna) has been captured while trying to supply weapons to the anti-Soviet Afghan Mujahideen, .. With the help of the Mujahideen, Rambo is able to rescue Trautman and eliminate the homicidal Soviet commander of that region. Ironically, Soviet troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan ten days before the film was released (starting in May 15, 1988).
Trivia
• The film depicts the CIA-supported mujahideen resistance to Soviet occupation in a heroic light, as it was viewed in the 1980s. In an example of blowback, the mujahideen movement formed the basis for al-Qaeda, as many battle-hardened veterans of Afghanistan joined the jihadist ranks, most famously Osama bin Laden. The mujahideen movement later split into Taliban and anti-Taliban movements, forming the two sides in Afghanistan's civil war.
• At the end of the movie the words "This film is dedicated to the gallant people of Afghanistan" can be seen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Blix Iraq disarmament crisis (2002-2003)
During the Iraq disarmament crisis before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Blix was called back from retirement by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to lead United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission in charge of monitoring Iraq. Kofi Annan originally recommended Rolf Ekéus, who worked with UNSCOM in the past, but both Russia and France vetoed his appointment. Hans Blix personally admonished Saddam for "cat and mouse" games [4] and warned Iraq of "serious consequences" if it attempted to hinder or delay his mission [5].
In his report to the UN Security Council on February 14, 2003, Blix claimed that "If Iraq had provided the necessary cooperation in 1991, the phase of disarmament -- under resolution 687 -- could have been short and a decade of sanctions could have been avoided." [6]
Blix's statements about the Iraq WMD program came to contradict the claims of the Bush administration, [7] and attracted a great deal of criticism from supporters of the invasion of Iraq. In an interview on BBC TV on 8 February 2004, Dr. Blix accused the U.S. and British governments of dramatising the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, in order to strengthen the case for the 2003 war against the regime of Saddam Hussein.
Newt Gingrich stated that approving Hans Blix as chief U.N. weapons inspector was one of the biggest mistakes ever made.
In an interview with London's Guardian newspaper, Hans Blix said, "I have my detractors in Washington. There are bastards who spread things around, of course, who planted nasty things in the media" [8].
In 2004, Blix published a book, Disarming Iraq, where he gives his account of the events and inspections before the coalition began its invasion. Ultimately, no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction were found.
No I don't agree. Nor do I agrre that any death is acceptable. It is all deplorable.
Stan 101 said:Don't forget sick extremeist christians have been killing people since it's inception. Hell, our monarch was still killing innocent peasants up until several generations ago
Stan 101 said:Westerners don't like muslim followers because muslims dress, eat and embrace culture differently to us.
Stan 101 said:Muslims believe we are polluting the earth with evil; and damn it, they have a fair point, to an extent. When we take into account the deviant quotient of any population, there will be nutbags, lunitics, and mentally unstable people.
Stan 101 said:Personally I think we a all part of a sick bastardized, selfish race.
Personally I think we a all part of a sick bastardized, selfish species
What about the last on the New Guinea tribes who have had their culture stolen and had western religion forced down their throat?
wayneL said:Sources please
A 2006 study by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health estimated that more than 601,000 Iraqis have died in this violence and that fewer than one third of these deaths came at the hands of Coalition forces
This is an ongoing human security project which maintains and updates the world’s only independent and comprehensive public database of media-reported civilian deaths in Iraq that have resulted from the 2003 military intervention by the USA and its allies. The count includes civilian deaths caused by coalition military action and by military or paramilitary responses to the coalition presence (e.g. insurgent and terrorist attacks). It also includes excess civilian deaths caused by criminal action resulting from the breakdown in law and order which followed the coalition invasion
wayneL said:Better invade all countries with WMD then.... ooops no oil.... ooops is US.
wayneL said:Fundamentalist everything needs a kick up the ****. Unfortunately because of our cognitive biases, we only see the transgressions of others. And that includes terrorism, we don't see our own
rederob said:Oddly enough the majority of innocent deaths of civilians in the USA are by Christians.
Don't you just hate those Christians!
Stan 101 said:No great loss? so you are saying it's okay for some humans to kills other humans that you don't happen to like? Thanks for backing up my point.
Stan 101 said:I certainly cannot condone the actions of people who are in guerrila type warfare in Iraq. I can certainly understand why they are doing it.
2020hindsight said:be interested in your source for that claim
2020hindsight said:I thought you said elsewhere that AQ were little more that a trumped up scare campaign
no you can't. you are completely missing the point.
Well.dude we aren't talking about christians. we aren't talking about america. we are talking about iraq.
ps. the majority of "innocent" deaths of civilians are among blacks. it's common among family and friends too.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm
dude thats wrong. i will happily sit here and criticise american foreign policy, the howard government or the hillsong church. the level of critical attention we place upon ourselves is vast. with the massive amounts of communication we generate nearly everything we do is recorded, displayed and criticised. people with eyes see very clearly the utter greed that is driving the american occupation of iraq.
social and political commentators attack everything they don't agree with, and this is the sign of a healthy society with a respectable level of free speech. our transgressions and terrorisms are broadcast 24/7 on the media of your choice to read if you wish. open and honest racial discussion is taboo though.
Because discussions on race are a nonsense and not rooted in scientific fact. Supposed biological differences in race have long since been discredited, so to remove every trace of any cultural considerations would reveal that humans are all essentially the same.open and honest racial discussion is taboo though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?