Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,699
- Reactions
- 10,316
Quite a distressing long term monthly chart on LEI.
Particularly over the last 6 years.
So Leightons gets an ASX price query on Friday due to higher volumes being traded and the price rising by ~10% and they respond with the standard "We don't know why and have no explanation for it". Next trading day there is a takeover bid. So if Leightons didn't know then someone did. Is this another ASIC sit on their hands moment, which I call a weekday?
Yes... definitely dodgy as. Often share price will at least take a rest upon the speeding ticket response, but it kept powering upwards on Friday. Thank God I didn't short them.
How can you make an offer that will take you from 59% to 74% without making an offer for all remaining shares?
What kept you away from going short? I went in as soon as I saw LEI's response on the speeding ticket..
They didn't make a takeover bid.... so my understanding is that s606 applies instead.Dunno. The same mechanism that lets them hold 59% and not do a takeover? I had to read the announcement a few times to make sure I understand the "proportional takeover" business.
I guess there are a few other companies with only a pretty small free float as they are majority-owned by different entities.
Just the price action after the response. It had every opportunity to fall but it didn't so I accepted the fact the buyer was better informed (and it's hard to argue that he/she isn't).
Plus I've been trading like $h.it so I just didn't want to chance something that didn't look right.
Section 606 prohibits the acquisition of a relevant interest in voting shares if, because of that transaction, a person's voting power in the company:
increases from under 20% to over 20% or
increases from a starting point that is above 20% and below 90%.
Whatever they did surely is working in their favour, spending AUD$1.16 billion to build up their share holding from 59% to 74%, while their original 59% share enjoyed a paper profit of almost AUD$1 billion just in the last 2 days.Dunno. The same mechanism that lets them hold 59% and not do a takeover? I had to read the announcement a few times to make sure I understand the "proportional takeover" business.
Just the price action after the response. It had every opportunity to fall but it didn't so I accepted the fact the buyer was better informed (and it's hard to argue that he/she isn't).
Plus I've been trading like $h.it so I just didn't want to chance something that didn't look right.
Whatever they did surely is working in their favour, spending AUD$1.16 billion to build up their share holding from 59% to 74%, while their original 59% share enjoyed a paper profit of almost AUD$1 billion just in the last 2 days.
Glad you dodged this, now thanks to this I have a clear March target: try to break even..
They didn't make a takeover bid.... so my understanding is that s606 applies instead.
http://www.takeovers.gov.au/content...mmary_of_takeover_provisions_in_australia.htm
They've gone from 59% to 74% if shareholders accept. From what I understand if they go to 75% ownership there is a trigger / issue in relation to the debt covenants.
Sorry I meant it goes from s606 to s611 (one of the exceptions), which means that it has to be accepted by shareholders without being a full takeover bid, more like an increase in control.
I walked off mid post because the phone rang and obviously forgot to write that bit.
They had previously been using the "3% creep" role to increase their control.
Ahh...so they can just put the offer to shareholders and if they accept then they get around the rules.
What kept you away from going short? I went in as soon as I saw LEI's response on the speeding ticket..
What an awesome rule. You have to do XYZ, unless you tell people you are not.
What an awesome rule. You have to do XYZ, unless you tell people you are not.
Did you hold onto your shorts or did they get recalled? I was puzzled by why it would trade above the indicative offer price. You can only sell 3 of 8 into the bid so the remaining 5 shares are not worth as much as the offer price. Now it's pretty clear that LEI will become a majority owned subsidiary that, while remaining listed, will have much lower liquidity and perhaps get kicked out of all the indices. A mop up offer may or may not eventuate... with highly uncertain timing and price.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?