Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,280
- Reactions
- 11,531
Those smaller intercepts are looking like 0.30% to 0.37% Copper equivalent (yes I know there's bugger all copper). That's not enough to be economic. I've discounted the moly to zero. Not even sure it would be recoverable? I think a copper project is probably easier to fund on a mega scale vs a gold project, but it's definitely gold dominant.I don't think anyone is assigning any value to Eduador but they might have to look now. This is a huge intercept. Low grades in AuEq, but this is Andes porphyry. Thinking of it gram gold meters it's 313 g/m gold. That's the same as about 100m @ 3 g/t. Interesting development.
Hopefully the follow up holes into the higher priority targets come up with something similar. Very early days in Ecuador.
View attachment 135674
View attachment 135673
a CuEq of > 0.6 or a AuEq of > 1g/t would excite me over 800+ meters. But 0.5%/0.8g/t would certainly be enough to keep things interesting to justify more drilling.
Seems only Blackrock cares about a measly 70m at 7g/t....
Have to think if gold didn't go up this week CEL would probably still be 27-28 cents!
Going by the plan posted by Sean K, there's a heap of assays outstanding...mostly in "open down dip" area. ?
They'll for sure have a resource modeled up on their computers by now. It seems clear that the average grade is going to be quite low, so the game is about adding bulk ounces. Better off holding out for as long as possible on publishing an MRE to get as many drill results back to maximize total ounces.I agree, CEL have been pretty good at bringing out regular results that on the surface seem outstanding, but there's been muted responses. Numerous intersections above 50 gold gram meters and a large number of over 100 along the entire known mineralised zone. If these drilling results came out in WA it'd be front page of the Mining Weekly.
Latest video presentation below.
The problem I see is the gaps between the mineralisation that the MD has addressed at least three times in other video presentations that I've seen. He says things along the lines of 'I know some people have said 'the deposit doesn't link up' or something like that, which I think he means there's big gaps between the stacks, and it looks like there is.
At about the 7min mark he starts talking about the deposit with some cartoons displaying the intersections and you can clearly see the gaps in the mineralisation. It's just how they strip and mine those high grade areas that I'm not sure about. He's continually said it's just one giant open pit, but that's a lot of waste.
Initial MRE was due early this year, but he's now saying it may be later this quarter but probably early next quarter. The aim is to have done half of the 200,000m of planning drilling for an initial MRE just so the market can appreciate the scale of what they've got. They're done 78,000m of drilling so far, so there's more to go for the MRE. I expect it may even be mid next quarter due to lab turn around times.
As above, and they haven't found the bottom of the system in the slightest, but they're focussed on the top 400m or so which will be amenable to open pit.
Ecuador drilling update due next week will be interesting. They could have a huge porphyry system there, which most Australian's won't get as they are low grade, but massive tonnage.
I'm waiting for the typical massive dilution from the Blackrock/institutional/executives 'mates' capital raising to 'accelerate resource growth' or whatever line the current power brokers are using these days. I just hope KK is smart enough (and has enough of a holding) that he can avoid that being done in the mid-high 20s.
Maybe interesting, but still not very exciting. Over long intercepts continues to look like high 0.3X% CuEq so I think it's completely uneconomic so far. Not everything is a winner, but this is why you do exploration. At least glad these guys had a crack at this site rather than spinning it off in to some IPO. What nonsense reporting 0.8m intercepts on holes like this. I also don't think gram meters should be published either.As usual, Australians wont understand the significance of this as it's a porphyry discovery. But, it might get more attention due to the polymetallic nature of it with some significant copper. And, it's just the start. Would have liked to see some higher Eq overall grades though.
Not sure what their longer term plan with this is. They definitely want a buyer for Hualian and they'll end up selling both the major projects but perhaps to different buyers.
View attachment 137967
Why is there no talk of hole 007?
Nice to see a professional junior which actually gets assays back in a timely manner. They need a lot more results like this to see if this could be economic but definitely 260 at 1.4 AuEq is good enough to me to justify the expenditure to keep drilling around the area, especially considering these hits start pretty well from surface.Ecuador shaping up to be something. I don't think there's any value assigned to this in CEL's SP.
200 gold gram meters plus is very significant. Especially the high grade zones.
View attachment 138812
View attachment 138813
Nice to see a professional junior which actually gets assays back in a timely manner. They need a lot more results like this to see if this could be economic but definitely 260 at 1.4 AuEq is good enough to me to justify the expenditure to keep drilling around the area, especially considering these hits start pretty well from surface.
Just need to get a handle on what kind of recoveries would be expected with ag, au, cu, mo.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?