pixel
DIY Trader
- Joined
- 3 February 2010
- Posts
- 5,359
- Reactions
- 345
http://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/displ...;idsId=01793928
Marriage consummated. We're now also into Solar and Batteries.
... and the Market seems to approve.
View attachment 68564
But another cap raising may be on the cards to cover the cash component of the takeover.
And that could spook a few traders.
(I hold, but will observe tight speccie rules.)
The announcement said the cash payments will be staged. I assume that to mean that it will be self funding from it's own income stream.
$2.6 million is not a lot to raise, CWE has raised more than that in gold royalties over the last three years.
The EU is still chipping in a fat grant for a Cornwall wave project.
Hasn't anybody told them about Brexit?
But as long as CWE keeps rising, let's not argue
View attachment 68726
I still hold.
This stock has a tendency to sell-off on perceived good news...same today so far. Let's hope this trait changes.
I hold in a long term - high risk, low cap portfolio.
:bananasmi:bananasmiBack to 5 cents again after a very long time in the doldrums. I am starting to feel good again.
Made a Higher Low, and is currently on its way to crack the November High. For starters, it's matching the resistance of Dec 6th, but today closed on top of a green candle. Needs more volume though to get me back on board.
View attachment 69116
Made a Higher Low, and is currently on its way to crack the November High. For starters, it's matching the resistance of Dec 6th, but today closed on top of a green candle. Needs more volume though to get me back on board.
View attachment 69116
Following recent news, including today's Mungari Farm, I'm getting a little concerned about CCE. Lots of shares, not much money, but they pursue opportunities all over the place. Each project has its merits and potential, but I ask myself, do they bite off more than they can chew?
In an email chain from August between Synergy and Treasurer and Minister for Energy Ben Wyatt’s office, Synergy expressed concerns about assumptions during the project’s expression of interest phase that the Albany Wave Farm would connect to the wind farm substation.
“Our advice to date, and what it will continue to be in the future, is that connection via an Albany-Grasmere Wind Farm substation is not possible due to current capacity issues,” the email said.
“Curtailing exiting wind turbine generation in order to accommodate a wave energy project is also not an option.”
Synergy also raised issues of commercial viability.
“There seems to be an expectation that Synergy will enter into an offtake agreement with the successful proponents ... unfortunately, as there has been no consultation with Synergy ... we have been flying a bit blind...” the documents said.
Synergy has since confirmed there have been no discussions to procure any energy from the facility.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?