Nyden
G.E. Money Genie
- Joined
- 23 May 2007
- Posts
- 1,368
- Reactions
- 1
I must say, I'm completely stunned as to how this happened? How the heck did CBA think they were going to dodge this - make a sly comment to the press, and expect everyone to be happy?
Oh well, there go my CBA profits; and probably then some!: I'm very disappointed though, as it looks as though it may have even opened in the green this morning ... only to have this nonsense come up.
I really am just stunned as to how they thought they were going to get away with itThis whole issue has been a mistake, they should have waited for (hopefully) higher prices.
Furthermore, would it not have been insider trading if these insto ivestors knew of the issues before the market did? I really hope this event results in more disclosure by more companies. All of this lying by omission really is hurting the Australian market, you only need to look over at OZL to see the mess it causes. Perhaps I should call CBA and ask for my shares for $1 less as well, afterall - I wasn't told either
Now I've seen everything - see announcement just released at 3:17 p.m. today.
Here's an excerpt:
"The Commonwealth Bank today announced that it had terminated the share placement agreement with Merrill Lynch International Australia Limited on the basis that Merrill Lynch did not inform potential investors of the various disclosures made by the Bank in its announcement released to the ASX at 7.30 pm on Tuesday 16 December 2008."
Hello?!? What about continuous disclosure and insider trading.
Apparently the information that CBA released after market yesterday to all of us 'other' investors, about the bad debts increasing, was supposed to be disclosed by Merril to potential investors during the capital raising. So Merril was obliged as part of the agreement to provide market sensitive information not yet disclosed to the market ... interesting.
Is there anything the banks can't get away with at the moment?
"Now I've seen everything - see announcement just released at 3:17 p.m. today.
Here's an excerpt:
"The Commonwealth Bank today announced that it had terminated the share placement agreement with Merrill Lynch International Australia Limited on the basis that Merrill Lynch did not inform potential investors of the various disclosures made by the Bank in its announcement released to the ASX at 7.30 pm on Tuesday 16 December 2008."
Hello?!? What about continuous disclosure and insider trading.
Apparently the information that CBA released after market yesterday to all of us 'other' investors, about the bad debts increasing, was supposed to be disclosed by Merril to potential investors during the capital raising. So Merril was obliged as part of the agreement to provide market sensitive information not yet disclosed to the market ... interesting.
Is there anything the banks can't get away with at the moment?"
Hahaha... I call bull****...
Seriously... come on ASIC. Here is a company admitting to forcing mandatory insider trading!!!
No wonder Merrill didn't tell their investors. Why should they? It's not their job to pass on information that should be known by the market. Hell!!! I think that is even massively illegal now!!
Through all of this CBA still got all of it's capital raising money which is the most important thing.
Still, it was an interesting screw up.
This is very odd. I think the institutions simply used it as an opportunity to extract a greater discount. I mean, come on, is it such a surprise that CBA's bad debts will increase? Are they really that naive?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?