Knobby22
Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast
- Joined
- 13 October 2004
- Posts
- 9,818
- Reactions
- 6,798
Well I'm still looking at Esplanade developement opportunities.
Who Are the Most Prominent Advocates of Global Warming?
Posted on 20 May 2012 by Rob Honeycutt
Last week, as many know, the Heartland Institute put up a billboard with a picture of Ted Kaczynski (the Unabomber) with the caption, "I still believe in global warming. Do you?" The outrage was instantaneous from people on all sides of the issue and the billboard was taken down within a day.
Heartland, though, has chosen not to apologize for making such an outrageous association. They have instead chosen to double down on their position and maintain a statement on their website where they include the statement...
"The people who still believe in man-made global warming are mostly on the radical fringe of society. This is why the most prominent advocates of global warming aren't scientists. They are murderers, tyrants, and madmen."
The statement defies all logic. It is a clear and fundmental logical fallacy like saying, "Hitler liked cats, so the most prominent cat-lovers are murdering fascists."
The insanity of the Heartland's statements have brought upon them a rash of companies pulling funding and an exodus of the people they had once listed as experts on their website.
Peter Sinclair has just produced a new video for the Yale Forum channel that takes a look at who the most prominent advocates of global warming science really are...
A World at War
We’re under attack from climate change””and our only hope is to mobilize like we did in WWII.
A bit off topic, but related to business and shares (as this is primarily a share/investor forum), l don't buy shares in any type of home insurance companies. With the weather patterns changing, more floods, storms etc etc will mean more payouts.
So you don't have confidence in the actuaries doing the requisite homework?
A bit off topic, but related to business and shares (as this is primarily a share/investor forum), l don't buy shares in any type of home insurance companies. With the weather patterns changing, more floods, storms etc etc will mean more payouts.
Hypothetical scenario. A cyclone hits a major city not presently considered to be in a cyclone area and thus with buildings that aren't built to cope.
Payout = truly massive and I do wonder if they'll cope.
Anyone like to take a guess what would happen in terms of costs and insurance payouts if a decent cyclone slammed into Sydney or Brisbane?
Unlikely yes but it's not totally impossible.
Agree that it is certainly possible.Hypothetical scenario. A cyclone hits a major city not presently considered to be in a cyclone area and thus with buildings that aren't built to cope.
Payout = truly massive and I do wonder if they'll cope.
Anyone like to take a guess what would happen in terms of costs and insurance payouts if a decent cyclone slammed into Sydney or Brisbane?
Unlikely yes but it's not totally impossible.
Hypothetical scenario. A cyclone hits a major city not presently considered to be in a cyclone area and thus with buildings that aren't built to cope.
Payout = truly massive and I do wonder if they'll cope.
Anyone like to take a guess what would happen in terms of costs and insurance payouts if a decent cyclone slammed into Sydney or Brisbane?
Unlikely yes but it's not totally impossible.
I reckon the insurance companies would declare bankruptcy and a lot of people would be homeless and destitute.
Most of that sort of catastrophic risk is reinsured.
Is that a guarantee ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?