Normal
I had a quick look at the Oxford judgement. There is nothing in there to indicate the prosecution was for providing software.It was to do with the courses, and several misleading statements about how much money Steven Moore claimed to be making by trading.http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FCA/2008/980.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=title(oxford investments )ETA: I would love to know the theory behind being able to code in C++ making you exempt from requiring an AFSL.
I had a quick look at the Oxford judgement. There is nothing in there to indicate the prosecution was for providing software.
It was to do with the courses, and several misleading statements about how much money Steven Moore claimed to be making by trading.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FCA/2008/980.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=title(oxford investments )
ETA: I would love to know the theory behind being able to code in C++ making you exempt from requiring an AFSL.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
