- Joined
- 18 May 2011
- Posts
- 13
- Reactions
- 0
Very interesting article in todays SMH about BGL.
The share price has risen over 50 percent since I first looked at it a month or so ago.
Over on RMs blog there are a couple of bloggers very keen on it.
IV for next year of 40c currently trading at 31.5cents. Good management team and good track record with other businesses. Very small cap stock only 45m but with plenty of potential.
Agreed. Too bad the MOS has been gobbled up by the fact the value has caught up with the price in such a short time.
BGL dropping quite heavily this week. These illiquid stocks are so volatile, any articles or reports out that could be causing the move?
While they certainly have dropped in price; from my calculations they are still trading well above their value.
I have them valued under 20 cents.
Also who are their main competitors?
They operate fixed wireless networks, Id be very careful that Telstra doesnt become a major competitor...thats what has kept me out thus far..
As for value..I think its worth closer to 30c than 20c...rising fast too.
They operate fixed wireless networks, Id be very careful that Telstra doesnt become a major competitor...thats what has kept me out thus far..
Hey guys
Just wanted to highlight a couple of the reasons why I don't believe Telstra is a threat to BGL's niche.
1. While Wimax is a wirelessly delivered technology, it is designed for fixed connections rather than mobile. 4G/LTE is for mobile users, and even at peak download rates of 100-150mbps downstream, Bigair can do 1gbps symmetrical as a business-grade service. (BGL is business customers only, and sells almost solely through the wholesale channel)
Isn't it being sold as a redundancy service rather than a primary internet connection? My question would be if it is a redundancy service how many businesses, without their own dedicated T1 line, would require 1gb up/down speed in an emergency? Further to that question, what happens if the network in say the CBD goes down, surely BGL's service will also go down, wouldn't it?
If they are planning on creating an alternative everyday network, what are the spectrum/bandwidth limitations? By that I mean how much can you physically transmit over a given amount of spectrum and how much spectrum is available or will become available (I think I read somewhere that analog TV spectrum will become available once it's switched off).
Finally, is it possible that Telstra/Optus/the other guy (Vodafone) could at some point begin building WiMax networks in the CBD's of the capital cities to handle some of the traffic from their 4G network? I know at the moment smartphones aren't equipped for WiMax but surely within 18 months this will be standard, given the lower capital cost of building WiMax networks.
It's an interesting sector and one I try and follow. To me though, technology is changing too fast to be able to make sense of where it will be in 2/5/10 years. The only thing that I do know for sure is that the amount of data transferred will continue to grow exponentially and that cable will remain the primary method for transporting that data, with the exception of the last mile.
Thanks BigLeon.
From reading what you wrote I'm still slightly confused as to what their competitive advantage is. They're essentially providing what is currently provided by cable through microwave. As long as they stay relatively small it's unlikely the big boys will bother competing (as I said in an earlier post, I think their RoE is due to their size not a moat). But how scaleable is the business? If their model is significantly less CAPEX intensive than cabling the last mile and data integrity/speed is as safe then surely competition will eat away at their business if it becomes successful, they are afterall providing a commodity.
I guess time will tell whether BGL faces serious competition in the future, but the barrier to entry for another provider to compete with them looks too risky for me - with an existing supplier doing a decent job, if I was a telco startup I'd become an NBN RSP and building value-added media/application services to differentiate. A base station costs about $250k.
They may be providing a commodity in wireless access network however in a commodity market the lowest price operator wins. Since CVA were merged into BGL an equivalent national wimax operator is yet to emerge.
I think given BGL's 50%+ revenue CAGR their growth isn't showing immediate signs of slowing, the beauty of telecoms industry is once you pay for your big fixed cost base everything else is money for jam - you can selectively invest where you see profit opportunity. Even if they didn't turn on a single new customer from today you have a business returning $850k EBITDA every month ($10.2m per annum)... for $45m with no debt.
I am a true believer, but time will tell whether I am mistaken
Excellent result today, while capex is peaking the business is still roaring ahead at the speed of electromagnetic wave propagation in free space
Link to my analysis here
I'm anticipating a full year EBITDA of $10.5M-$11M, given their current run rate, future synergies, and HY12's result of $4.57MForecast of $9M? They'll smash that
Tracking well for maiden dividend
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?