This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Barack Obama!

Re: Barack 2008!

Barack in Berlin

This has been anticipated by the press to be an historic speech.
Video and the transcript. Watch or read or read as you watch:
I listened to the whole thing, even managed not to scream at the screen, even though my bullsh!t meter was registering maximum.

How can the world trust a man who has such poor grasp of the real issues of this planet and indulges in such populous, syrupy sweet platitudes that makes any pragmatist want to vomit? Yet reading between the lines, there is a dangerous agenda for liberty loving humanity.

This man speaks with forked tongue.

And the problem is, the alternative is not very palatable either.
 
Re: Barack 2008!

His whistlestop tour of the Middle East and Europe has only reinforced my view that he is nothing more than a charismatic charlatan who would be gravely out of his depth if elected leader of the free world.

The "out of his depth" sentiment resonates with me. It's one thing to be able to look personable and use a good speaking voice to mouth platitudes, but quite another to actually take responsibility for such a huge position as President of the USA.

His quasi hysterical following is reminiscent of that following a rock star but I wonder if the great American public are just indulging themselves with him at this stage, but will ultimately opt for the age (and presumed wisdom) of McCain. He is less than appealing also. I'm glad I don't have the responsibility of choosing one of these two totally unattractive candidates.
 
Re: Barack 2008!


I can't recall an American president or candidate who doesn't deliver speeches full of "populous, syrupy sweet, platitudes". The best clues are what those platitudes are directed at. Although his ablitiy to address the issues can only be viewed historically, the issues are bang on the money. Whereas McCain's focusing on continueing the Bush administration's efforts at decimating the American economy by "Bomb, bomb, bombing Iran", and so on, further increasing a catastrophic debt, at least Obama is proposing to address the real issues. Take a couple of other examples:

Health - the States is the only modern economy that I can think of that does not have a national health system. From either a humane or economic perspective, access to health care is vital and a given in just about all developed countries.

It is also one of the greatest impediments to social mobility. American's regard their country as 'the land of opportunity, however it has lower social mobility than pretty much anywhere in the developed world ie. an expensive entrenched underclass. At least the Democrats are talking about addressing the issue.

Climate change - save for a few who regard themselves as more qualified to comment than the near consensus in the scientific community who are qualified, it's generally agreed the costs of inaction are far greater than the costs of action. Again, McGoat is silent.

Remains to be seen how he does if/when he achieves office. I shudder to think how much further the US and the rest of the world will suffer if the neo-cons (in whatever clothing) continue their hatchet job on everything from health to world peace to the economy.
 
Re: Barack 2008!

...Health - the States is the only modern economy that I can think of that does not have a national health system. From either a humane or economic perspective, access to health care is vital and a given in just about all developed countries.
well skint , we have Gough to thank for that
 
Re: Barack 2008!

the near consensus in the scientific community who are qualified, it's generally agreed the costs of inaction are far greater than the costs of action. Again, McGoat is silent.

Near consensus does not indicate intellectual integrity, particularly in something so successfully contested by the great body of dissenters (which actually shows less consensus that portrayed), it shows that there is a great political/financial/social expediency, ergo, a gravy train.

There are great costs of inaction, but there may be greater cost with wrong-action. Obama, just like the other compartments on the gravy train propose wrong-action. This will be at great cost to liberty and paradoxically, the environment as well.
 
Re: Barack 2008!


Loved how he began and ended his speech with 'improbable':
"The journey that led me here is improbable."
"We are a people of improbable hope."

Loved his use of alliteration and imagery:
'From Kiev to Cape Town, prison camps were closed, and the doors of democracy were opened.'

'The streets where we stand were filled with hungry families who had no comfort from the cold.
But in the darkest hours, the people of Berlin kept the flame of hope burning.'

Loved his dig at GWB and Guantanamo Bay:
'Will we reject torture and stand for the rule of law?'


His aim was to establish a rapport with the leaders he met and revive the memory of historic symbiosis... WWII:


He made them see that he had listened and heard and understood what Europeans thought:

In Europe, the view that America is part of what has gone wrong in our world, rather than a force to help make it right, has become all too common.

I thought McCain would castigate him over this! Isn't this comment reminiscent of Rev Wright's rants about '9/11 and chickens coming home to roost'? He was brave enough and honest enough to acknowledge animosity towards the foreign policies of his country.

(Sulky sour-grapes McCain said he would like to give a speech in Berlin.
... as president of the US not as a contender. Humph!):

And then Barack planted the seed for their cooperation:


He encapsulated the crises facing common humanity:


He made them feel important and valued... reminded them that the US had helped them in the past:


McCain rattled for Barack to go to the front and discard his neophyte label.
Then the media jumps on his absence for all this time! A week!
They want him to save the US - not the world!


How would Europeans view this statement? Was he merely manipulating them?!

Now he’s a tall poppy will the press continue these recent chops?
His charismatic trip is criticized as though they own him - not the world!



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ockstar-moment-in-berlin-backfire-877802.html
 
Re: Barack 2008!

well skint , we have Gough to thank for that

Hi 20/20...and free education, no fault divorce, ended concription, reduced tarriffs, opened relations with China etc..

He tried to do a bit but much too soon and foreign policy unfortunately wasn't his strong suit, but the progressive reforms way outshine the shortcomings IMHO. BTW, In the last half of the Howard years, thay were the only government who managed to outspend Whitlam in relevant terms!
 
Re: Barack 2008!


...and the ideologue doth reveal itself.
 
Re: Barack 2008!

This will be at great cost to liberty and paradoxically, the environment as well.

Sounds like a "syrupy sweet platitude" to me. It reads like "if we recognise that a healthy environment is inextricrably linked to a robust economy, it will be the end of Truth, Justice and the American Way and life as we know it." Bit of catastrophising there. Care to expand on what you meant?
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Barack's most likely running mate keeps changing lol.
Evan Bayh now favourite. - yet more reading up to do.

Me too...

He certainly has all the symptoms of Obama's values:

His record looks good experience for hard economic times!


http://bayh.senate.gov/about/biography/

But he could make a top adviser. I'd prefer Kathleen Sebelius... need a woman at the top!
 
Re: Barack 2008!

I listened to the whole thing, even managed not to scream at the screen, even though my bullsh!t meter was registering maximum.

Now Wayne... it's OK to reveal your emotions!
But it's admirable that you kept your mouth shut and listened.


What issues did he omit?

Spit them out!

... forked tongue and all.


Do you think his speech was a sinister prelude to mandatory involvement in his future battle scenarios?

I have to say I admire his public introduction of himself outside his own country and his simultaneous achievement of introducing his concept of mustering the free countries of the world to be more involved in the solutions for the down-trodden ones... Darfur, Zimbabwe, Burma, Somalia etc

Perhaps a hidden agenda is pragmatically to enable him to focus on re-building the health and strength of his own country, thus saving many billions by organizing the rest of the world to do their share?

Note he focused on their supporting Afghanistan... not Iraq!

As I've said, I'm a David E Kelly addict. He's had several episodes of Boston Legal where Alan Shore has decried the billions the US has spent on aid to the rest of the world whilst millions of Americans are living in poverty.
Also the conditions the US has demanded in return for monetary favours.

Hmmm... Maybe Kelly is one of Obama's advisers...
 
Re: Barack 2008!

German Government Sees Obama Speech as "Positive Signal"



Howzat for having an impartial each-way bet!

Other German politicians said:

"It was the speech of a man of the world that was directed not only at Germans and Europeans, but also at Americans."

"Obama had raised outstanding issues that Germany and Europe had to respond to, for example the German contribution to the NATO effort in Afghanistan."

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,3514249,00.html

Mr McCain is hoping that by touring small towns in the US and focusing on domestic issues, he will score points with voters who care little about foreign policy.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7524300.stm

Obama Gives A Speech We All Can Agree With


http://blogs.dw-world.de/acrossthepond/michael/1.6844.html
 
Re: Barack 2008!


Doris, I have a feeling you would even be impressed if he jumped up on a hickory stump, pulled out a golden fiddle and a band of demons joined in. (God bless Charlie Daniels)

As for David E Kelly, fantastic producer and always with a pertinent message, but David E Kelly, Obama is not.

There is a striking discord between his populous rhetoric and the policy he has thus far revealed. Think of Bob Hawke and his ludicrous "no child living in poverty" corker. It's all rubbish.

This is America we are talking about and the military/industrial complex has more power than all the Obamas in the world. Even if his intentions match his rhetoric, which his policies say will not happen, he won't get past the faceless billionaires of said establishment... and I think he is actually playing his hand directly to them while deceive the plebs.

You will be dissappointed and disillusioned in 4 years time... possibly very bloody angry.

Mark my words.
 
Re: Barack 2008!

A humorous, and basically spot on commentary on the Messiah from Gerard Baker:

by
Gerard Baker

And it came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant), when the whole land from the Arabian desert to the shores of the Great Lakes had been laid barren, that a Child appeared in the wilderness.

The Child was blessed in looks and intellect. Scion of a simple family, offspring of a miraculous union, grandson of a typical white person and an African peasant. And yea, as he grew, the Child walked in the path of righteousness, with only the occasional detour into the odd weed and a little blow.

(read the rest on the link below)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/gerard_baker/article4392846.ece


I have a few Democrat friends who have totally surprised me that they are voting for McCain over Obama. These are staunch Democrats, but they don't think Obama is fit to be President with his extreme left wing values, connections (Rev. Wright, et al), and no credentials.

Many on this forum will be surprised when McCain wins fairly easily. Not quite a landslide, but a very healthy margin. This election is for President of the United States after all, not President of the World.
 
Re: Barack 2008!

The two favourites for VP Candidates , GOP and Dems ...:-

Vintage Romney on McCain's chances against Obama

Prior to looking to the Republican VP position, Romney was fairly pessimistic on McCain's chances against Obama.

CNN - Bayh defends Obama's patriotism

If Obama had had his way, we wouldn't even be facing these problems today in Iraq - Also he's right about withdrawal strategy in Iraq - even Bush is coming around to that point of view.....etc
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Wayne you are just going to have to stop your negative vibes!

Poor Barack came back exhausted no doubt from eight days visiting Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, Israel, the West Bank, Germany, France and Britain to a slur that he didn't include injured soldiers.

Shame Obama! What were you thinking! You visited troops on the ground but not the wounded in Germany!

Could have been worse... McCain could have complained that Obama ate local food.

But you can't really blame McCain as nobody cared when he travelled to the same countries earlier this year.

Obama returns to rocky homecoming after overseas trip


But Barack has the knack for not playing spurious side-tracking games.


http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=8f95b7a1-a426-4406-8214-21304f84820d
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Jayzuz!!!

Tough gig this Messiah caper!
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Jayzuz!!!

Tough gig this Messiah caper!

Too true!

Glad you kept your butterfly still...


http://news.scotsman.com/opinion/Chris-Stephen-How-Obama-dazzled.4329510.jp
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Wayne, maybe he didn't offend Mohammad?


Obama said he was pleased with his trip, though he acknowledged that it does not make him a foreign policy expert.


And he diffused McCain's slur:

In Chicago he looks like he didn't eat local food whilst away!

http://www.boston.com/news/politics...ays_us_must_reassert_world_leadership/?page=2
 

Attachments

  • 539w.jpg
    14.8 KB · Views: 59
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...