- Joined
- 26 October 2018
- Posts
- 21
- Reactions
- 24
Strong economy???
Check the RBA assessment this week. A classic libcon disconnect. Pure marketing from a run of the mill marketer.
Yeah!Unemployment up and growth forecast down.
Great economic managers these Libs.
But they were only allegations, not facts.Boat people or Rwandan genociders ?
" Geez, fair go! Not the boat people, the queue jumpers. I'll take the Rwandan killers every day !!!"
overheard in a conversation between Scomo, Abbott, Dutton and Howard
You're entitled to believe the americans that they exhaustively vetted these people. Like our leaders did in for the WMD Iraq war.But they were only allegations, not facts.
And...they were not terrorists. Instead, they were just misguided murderers.
Also, they never posed a threat to American society and never will...now.
Plus, we only had to take a few murderers while the Americans now have to look after hundreds of psychologically damaged women and children.
Anyway, if they cause any trouble we can probably claim they were undocumented Maoris and repatriate them across the ditch.
All good.
Well there is four I know personally, that have either reduced their capital or are reducing their capital to get the part pension, they are of pension age.How many people do you think the franking credit changes will force onto "welfare" ?
In the U.S people were walking away from negative equity houses, just handing in the keys, as the loan is against the house not the person. The opposite is the case in Australia.Labor's big spend. Big debt.
Are they saying that they wouldn't have done the same thing responding to the GFC? Really? Australia was one of the very very few countries that avoided a recession with that Keynesian policy in response to Wall St's/US governments incompetece/negligence in sparking the financial meltdown. China did what we did, spent big, which helped us as well. While people in the US were losing their houses to the repossession banker swill, and many committing suicide, australia avoided that 'inconvenient" collateral damage.
What? If you are going to scrap negative gearing for "boomer investors" wouldn't you do that for ALL investors? Or are we just going to pick on older people? And don't forget, any rules in place now is available to ALL people in Australia, young and older, so if you wish to use them you can. There is nothing stopping any Australian utilising the laws that are in place, same rules for all players, that's fair.Scrap negative gearing for the boomer investors. Switch the negative gearing to 1st home buyers, the generation that has been so poorly catered for by the 'selfish' generation
First home buyers can negatively gear if it's a new home.Scrap negative gearing for the boomer investors. Switch the negative gearing to 1st home buyers, the generation that has been so poorly catered for by the 'selfish' generation
Whilst I can see definite problems with negative gearing as a concept in multiple ways, there's absolutely nothing standing in the way of any adult doing it right now.Scrap negative gearing for the boomer investors. Switch the negative gearing to 1st home buyers, the generation that has been so poorly catered for by the 'selfish' generation
One .would expect a knock down to be a new build, or else everything becomes dependent on new land releases.Anyone know if Labor is going to treat "knock down and rebuild" as a new or existing premise for NG purposes ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?