IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,653
- Reactions
- 4,730
I think the most massive mistake that the liberals have made in this campaign is allowing the Labor Party to frame the dividend imputation issue as a taxpayer funded gift to people who don't pay tax.
Scomos explanations of the issue, whike technically accurate are not understandable to the broad bulk of the populace.
If in Australia we support that you have no double taxation, then this policy will be an absolute travesty and will cause low income retirees to pay a larger effective tax rate than those people on much higher incomes.
It is both unfair and hard hearted and while I cannot find myself supporting the liberals at this time, I hope they can pull a rabbit out of the Hat to hold those postmodern bolsheviks out of government.
Franking denial for Seniors as proposed by Labor is unfair, age-ist and cynical.The one single issue that has swayed my vote against Labor has been the Franking Credit Rebates issue. They say there are up 1 Million Self Funded Retirees that may be affected and they are not the wealthy ones. I just hope that all the seniors are clued about this and vote against Labor and stop this unjust tax against retired people. I got a feeling that this election is not a forgone conclusion and that the Labor Party has under estimated the backlash of this policy. I took a bet of $4.25 to $1 that the Libs will form Government, I hope my hunches are right. Here's a photo I snapped yesterday in my marginal electorate, good luck all.
View attachment 94554
A 2010 Newspoll of Australians found 5% of respondents were vegetarian. So we can safely outlaw vegetarianism then? It's only 5% and probably a healthy proportion of Greens voters. I bet that little baby with Rickets in the news this week wishes it was outlawed!Labor reckons that 95% of retirees will be unaffected by their franking credit changes, and the 5% that are would probably not vote for them anyway.
BTW, that photo is of a long deceased US woman and has been used in political campaigns around the world, she doesn't care about franking credits.
A simple solution that most "genuine" self funded retirees would be reasonably happy with is just outright ban the practice of franking.I hear it said that it is hard for retirees to change from shares?Shares are liquid and can be almost instantly sold.As I have said there are many other investment opportunities,but the franking credits lurk is too hard to pass up.Think on your feet!
Even if those figures are true, good governance doesn't involve punishing those who voted for someone else. Rather, it involves governing for the greater good and convincing them to vote for you next time.Labor reckons that 95% of retirees will be unaffected by their franking credit changes, and the 5% that are would probably not vote for them anyway.
One pretty reliable gauge I use is the prices achieved at thoroughbred yearling sales. Although there are other factors other than strength of the economy, it's not a bad barometer.The Coalition's "strong economy" lie.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05...tical-rhetoric-of-the-strong-economy/11102998
Even if those figures are true, good governance doesn't involve punishing those who voted for someone else. Rather, it involves governing for the greater good and convincing them to vote for you next time.
A company makes a profit and pays its tax on that profit.Pay shareholders their dividend and they can pay the appropriate rate of Income Tax on it exactly the same as bank interest or anything else including unfranked dividends. Simple and stops loopholes unless someone engages in outright fraud.
Zali now ahead of Tony in the betting stakes, which was not the case to begin.Warringah is interesting.
Appears there is a push for Labor voters to put Abbott in front of Steggle. The mess Abbott will cause in opposition could greatly help the Labor party. It's known he hates Morrison.
First, not everyone has an account based pension with a theoretical number attached.Superannuation was initially designed to be consumed in the retirement phase. So why is it seemingly wrong to do so and consider that the investment income from a SMSF must equal the account-based pension? At age 65 with $1M the account-based pension is $50k (the equivalent of a wage earner on $63k.) There is nothing adverse in consuming capital to fund retirement.
Warringah indeed is very interesting and I hope Tony gets the boot once and for all. Steggall is a much better candidate and if I was still living there I would be voting for her.Warringah is interesting.
Are sure you're not missing the point Belli? Self funded retirees take the pressure off the pension system, just as the privately health insured (probably next on Labor's hit list) take the pressure off the public health system.Superannuation was initially designed to be consumed in the retirement phase. So why is it seemingly wrong to do so and consider that the investment income from a SMSF must equal the account-based pension? At age 65 with $1M the account-based pension is $50k (the equivalent of a wage earner on $63k.) There is nothing adverse in consuming capital to fund retirement.
However, the point that Bowen makes is that the very wealthy in retirement can literally receive a tax refund well in excess of $100k and all that is money that is now lost from government revenue as the company tax component has been negated.Are sure you're not missing the point Belli? Self funded retirees take the pressure off the pension system, just as the privately health insured (probably next on Labor's hit list) take the pressure off the public health system.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?