explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,197
This woman thing has gone too far. Women already have too many opinions. I guess it is their right but the time for reminding ourselves that women are now allowed to do this and that is long gone. Yes, I know women have opinions as I am constantly reminded by every single source of communication that women this, women that ......
I care about women in so far as they're the erotic naked kind, beyond that I just don't want to hear about it anymore.
That being said, Tony Abbott is not a real man. He is a soft handed, blue blooded posh private school boy inner city elitist scum bag who has never done a hard days work in his life and would in fact shatter the lively hood of many of these stereotypical "real men".
Gillard has also been the victim of terrible sexism and abuse and this country should be ashamed. That has nothing to do with her being a woman and a lot to do with the attitude of others towards women, which unfortunately yes, old men in positions of power with lots and lots of money do tend to be a tad sexist.
Has a Y chromosome.
Sorry to sound glib but that is my real answer. I don't feel my sense of being a man is dependpant on anythng else, and the characteristics that I admire in male role models are also present in females. I can list those characteristics in that context if you wish.
All these rights women have, how dare they, indeed the cheek they have.
We blokes have not done a very good job of the world and I bet with women more in control (and they are not yet) to an equal degree, there would be less war and more productivity as pointed out in a post I made yesterday.
You like the look of them and I do agree; sad but very true that a lot of our brains are below the belt.
"Old men a tad sexist" you are so kind.
I support you comment on the treatment of Gillard but I do think it has more to do with her being a woman than most will concede.
Not an Abbott fan myself but do not agree on his manhood as you put it. We have the freedom in this wonderful country to be as we want and I do not believe there is a particular stereotype that describes a man in the context of our conversation here.
I will think about this, maybe we need to re-define/direct the path of our discussion in line with the thread title.
You do know how to spin a ball gg.
All these rights women have, how dare they, indeed the cheek they have.
We blokes have not done a very good job of the world and I bet with women more in control (and they are not yet) to an equal degree, there would be less war and more productivity as pointed out in a post I made yesterday.
You like the look of them and I do agree; sad but very true that a lot of our brains are below the belt.
"Old men a tad sexist" you are so kind.
I support you comment on the treatment of Gillard but I do think it has more to do with her being a woman than most will concede.
Not an Abbott fan myself but do not agree on his manhood as you put it. We have the freedom in this wonderful country to be as we want and I do not believe there is a particular stereotype that describes a man in the context of our conversation here.
I will think about this, maybe we need to re-define/direct the path of our discussion in line with the thread title.
You do know how to spin a ball gg.
I think you would be surprised how many you think are critical of J Gillard because of sexism would be admirers of one M Thatcher.
No, this sexism/misogyny card that is being played is pure, low down dirty politicking and you are part of that Mr Plod.
Exactly.I think you would be surprised how many you think are critical of J Gillard because of sexism would be admirers of one M Thatcher.
No, this sexism/misogyny card that is being played is pure, low down dirty politicking
I agree with what you say about the Y chromosome and would also be very interested in seeing your gender indiscriminate list of admirable characteristics.
Exactly.
With thanks to those who have offered their definition of 'a real man', I'm hoping some more of you blokes will contribute here.
Real Men Don't Eat Quiche, by American Bruce Feirstein, is a bestselling tongue-in-cheek book satirizing stereotypes of masculinity, published in 1982 (ISBN 0-671-44831-5).
It popularized the term quiche-eater, in an attempt to refer to or suggest a man who is a dilettante, a trend-chaser, an over-anxious conformist to fashionable forms of 'lifestyle', and socially correct behaviors and opinions, one who eschews (or merely lacks) the traditional masculine virtue of tough self-assurance. A 'traditional' male might enjoy the ironically not so exotic egg-and-bacon pie if his wife served it to him; a quiche-eater, or Sensitive New Age Guy is alleged to make the dish himself, call it by its French name quiche, and serve it to his female life partner to demonstrate his empathy with the Women's Movement. Presumably, he would also wash up afterwards. These are also implied examples of 'women's work', and an attempt to taint the male character by association with such knowledge and activities.
No, this sexism/misogyny card that is being played is pure, low down dirty politicking and you are part of that Mr Plod.
- Self awareness about who they are.
- Engages in industrious endeavours with passion and purpose.
- A thirst for knowledge, curious about life, the universe, and everything.
- Encourages growth in themselves and others.
- Honest about how they represent others.
- Courage and persistence in adversity with the wisdom to know when to withdraw.
- Silent about their charity.
- Accommodating of others who differ and disagree.
You're asking us to offload a lot of cultural baggage which I don't think is possible across a generation or three. Maybe our great grandchildren will be transitioning to gender neutral values and identity stereotypes.Exactly.
With thanks to those who have offered their definition of 'a real man', I'm hoping some more of you blokes will contribute here. I am asking quite genuinely because I'm a bit worried some people see a real man as someone who can drink the next bloke under the table then boast about how bad their hangover is the next day, and who doesn't mind using his fists rather than his capacity for verbal negotiation to solve an argument.
I try to avoid commenting on personal traits of politicians, but have to admit to wincing every time I watch Mr Abbott's pugilistic stance when he walks. Probably doesn't mean anything, but I suspect most women find it less than appealing.
The story of Jesus: By Some Dude.
In a manger, in a faraway place, called Bethlehem, a baby Jesus was born to a woman called Mary and her partner Josephine with the help of a Blessed IVF Team called Three Wise Men.......
I take back what I said about you and will place you on ignore again, as you sound like the second Mrs Gumnut who still manages to annoy me.
On one thing we do agree. You are a glib pillock.
gg
ps dependent is spelt that way for a reason, so that it does not rhyme with pedant.
gg
You're asking us to offload a lot of cultural baggage which I don't think is possible across a generation or three. Maybe our great grandchildren will be transitioning to gender neutral values and identity stereotypes.
No, I wasn't asking anyone to offload any cultural baggage. Don't know where you got that idea.You're asking us to offload a lot of cultural baggage which I don't think is possible across a generation or three. Maybe our great grandchildren will be transitioning to gender neutral values and identity stereotypes.
Sorry, only saw that line of thought in the last few posts. A 'real' Aussie man is still the sum of his DNA and cultural upbringing. We don't make this stuff up. Tony Abbott probably only appeals to the other Aussie men who are happy wearing budgie smugglers too...Or would like to be able to. Many would prefer to associate with something else I guess. To me, it's still all about a race to the middle for these guys and girls, in Australia. Which I like. When the radical left or right start gaining momentum, I'll start worrying.No, I wasn't asking anyone to offload any cultural baggage. Don't know where you got that idea.
Sorry, only saw that line of thought in the last few posts. A 'real' Aussie man is still the sum of his DNA and cultural upbringing. We don't make this stuff up. Tony Abbott probably only appeals to the other Aussie men who are happy wearing budgie smugglers too...Or would like to be able to. Many would prefer to associate with something else I guess. To me, it's still all about a race to the middle for these guys and girls, in Australia. Which I like. When the radical left or right start gaining momentum, I'll start worrying.
Perhaps Wikipedia has the answer to this vexing question;
Real Men Don't Eat Quiche, by American Bruce Feirstein, is a bestselling tongue-in-cheek book satirizing stereotypes of masculinity, published in 1982 (ISBN 0-671-44831-5).
It popularized the term quiche-eater, in an attempt to refer to or suggest a man who is a dilettante, a trend-chaser, an over-anxious conformist to fashionable forms of 'lifestyle', and socially correct behaviors and opinions, one who eschews (or merely lacks) the traditional masculine virtue of tough self-assurance. A 'traditional' male might enjoy the ironically not so exotic egg-and-bacon pie if his wife served it to him; a quiche-eater, or Sensitive New Age Guy is alleged to make the dish himself, call it by its French name quiche, and serve it to his female life partner to demonstrate his empathy with the Women's Movement. Presumably, he would also wash up afterwards. These are also implied examples of 'women's work', and an attempt to taint the male character by association with such knowledge and activities.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?