- Joined
- 21 April 2005
- Posts
- 3,922
- Reactions
- 5
Are you talking about the current regime in Afghanistan? Are they creating a charade to make the west believe in order to stay in the area? Is this what you mean? It 's not clear in your post what you were stating.Taliban are not the existential threat as reported by the media. It is a strategy (although stupid) of making the west coughing up the money, so that it can prop up its army and bureaucracy, which is creating this whole charade.
a simple google search begs to differ.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_and_weapons_of_mass_destructionThe U.S.-based Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) estimates that Pakistan has built 24–48 (Highly Enriched Uranium) HEU-based nuclear warheads with HEU reserves for 30-52 additional warheads.[9][10]
and you base this on what?
I was happy pre Rudd Mayk.....and you're happy to put up all Hazara and Tamils at your place? as they're all persecuted in your books...maybe you and Barnesy can lease a P&O liner and help them over for visa and asylum seeker processing....save them the stress of dealing with Rudd's scumbag low life new pubic enemy no.1 'People Smugglers'
and hey, I hear Iran can't handle anymore than the 2 million afghanis refugees it has accepted over the years. better go fetch them too.....life would be a bitch there huh? better bring em out here..... I mean otherwise how are you going to retain your smug moral superiority and righteous indignation....
Are you talking about the current regime in Afghanistan? Are they creating a charade to make the west believe in order to stay in the area? Is this what you mean? It 's not clear in your post what you were stating.
If so, what about Paskistan?
Because of recent history. When they get a continuous supply of money as per Bush Administration given to Musharaf, there were not that much fuss. Now that there is no money coming in, they have created this "huge monster", which is about to engulf Pakistan.
Are you saying that Pakistan Army with 7-largest military (by quantity not quality) in the world is not able to fight 5-20 thousand loosely connected Talibans? It is all about money and weapons they are trying to get passed through the American congress, on the basis that if they don't do it Pakistan will collapse soon. It is all a media charade. You will know soon, when the money start tickling in it will all be "under-control".
Of course I will support that any person coming to Australia should be tested as a valid asylum seeker, and if found otherwise should be sent back on his boat. No need to even fly them back, if they can come by boat, they can leave by boat...
hahahahha....carte blanche slap the back of my head thick.....that's the thing with you smugly indignant holier than any God types....you haven't got the subtelty of mind to realize how totally unhinged and ungrounded your morally superior 'Alice in Hoochland' ideals are.
Just like Rudd's woolley warm feeling volvo socialist feelgood moment telling the world he'll warmly and patiently process all boat people's asylum claims, the idiot failed to account for the fact that he'll have to divert more tax dollars to employ more people to deal with the 10s of thousands that he just encouraged to come and get a piece of the welfare state......(or could it be he's hedging his bets that most economic opportunists wouldn't be so stupid or wealthy as to try the ocean route?)
You and Rudd are saying, we don't care if 100,000 boaties show up every year, us chardonnay socialists are going to feel even more morally superior and extra warm and fuzzy for processing you all, the more the merrier.....come on over.....and we are going to use David Marr and Barnsey to legally prove you are legitimate asylum seekers, in a court of LAW no less....and give you free entry.....as long as you have a passport from your country of origin and a forged UN letter saying you are a refugee seeking asylum......it's a done deal.....just go to our website and get the info on how to meet our exacting and rigorous system's requirements....after processing you in a timely manner (say 10 minutes after the Royal Australian Navy comes out to cordially welcome you with a cuppa), you'll be flown down to Melbourne or Sydney, given a hot meal, free accommodation and hospital care, welfare payments, job retraining......and we don't even expect you to get a job and stop being a net liability on the tax system....cos, we feel so guilty we are just happy you gave us this chance to feel better about ourselves on the world stage.........
brouhahahahhaaa.....
so Mayk, how many asylum seekers do you want to cap your offer at?
Again, where have I stated anything about taking in the refugees? Oh yes in you paranoid world, anyone who disagrees with you must be supporting the intake. Typical "with us or against us" mentality, inherited from your spiritual leader.
where did you say anything about taking in the refugees????? how about reading your first paragraph above, you sad twisted little boy....now go back to futzing with your linux box and learning how to use google......hahahahha
So your view is that the US, Japan, and all the other countries throwing money at Pakistan are too stupid to realize the game plays of the murderers of Benazir Bhutto.....the situation isn't as amenable to dumbing down to your quaint level of understanding Mayk. It isn't just a matter of 5-20k of loosely connected opium farmers....it is a struggle against manipulative extremists who exploit the poor and desperate throughout Pakistan and the middle east, to carry out insurgent operations......this isn't just a war against the Taliban, it is a war against manipulators like Al Queda who manipulate the minds of young Muslims everywhere to die doing their bidding, and are discarded like pawns on a chess board.
P.S. By taking in the refugees I meant without any proper legal work, in my previous post.
hey, I have my own perpetual fresh daily supply of premium grade laurels.........no guilt driven sycophantic fawning for world adoration in this little black duck....
gawd, you just keep digging a deeper hole.....so how exactly does an Australian new graduate lawyer, under the paternal guidance of 'Barnsey, Dollar Signs in the Eyes Marr, and Associates', prove that a bloke from Afghanistan who just got off the boat, actually had his life threatened more than any of the 3.3 million Hazara who weren't compelled to leave town?????
Hey, maybe Rudd can employ a member of the Taliban to come over here and argue the case for the defence.......I can see it now.....Marr in all his melodramatic existential angst, shouting and spitting to the judge and jury, that this man's life is at risk if we unconscionably send him back to Afghanistan.....we can't do it in all good conscience your honour.....
The Taliban man will say, We never threatened to kill him.....we only threatened to beat him if he shaved..........
Marr will turn around and screaaammmmmm "Your Honour, how can we possibly let this man return to a country that does not grant the fundamental human right of shaving....I say this man before you, his wellbeing is at risk, if he is sent back to Afghanistan...."
hahahahhahahehehehehhehehohohoohoh.......I gotta go for a moment Mayk....point percy at the pommy porcelain, shake hands with the wife's best friend.....but thanks for the entertainment......and look forward to having a few more laughs.....
which Linux dist are you using btw?
First of all they cannot hire expensive lawyers, most of them would be the do-goody, hippy enough-space-for-all-of-us sort of fella you despise. So dollar in the eye question is out.
Second, let the judge decide. Stop being one.
Linux, mostly Fedora.
Rudd's policies encourage would-be asylum seeker
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/04/24/2551337.htm
Hope Rudd has some spare beds at his place, sounds like the detention centres will be over flowing in no time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?