- Joined
- 16 June 2005
- Posts
- 4,281
- Reactions
- 6
Great point. Unless the government does something, the boats will keep on coming.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Solution
In 2001, 43 boats carried 5516 asylum-seekers here
In 2002, there was one boat and one asylum-seeker
In 2003, there was one boat carrying 53 people
In 2004, there was one boat carrying 15 people
In 2005, there were four boats carrying 11 people
In 2006, there were six boats carrying 60 people
In 2007, there were five boats carrying 148 people
In 2008, there were seven boats carrying 161 people
In 2009, there were 61 boats carrying 2727 people
So far in 2010, there have been 129 boats carrying 6232 people.
And there you have it, Sails. The government is trying to recapture the votes they lost to the Greens, hence the 'be kind to asylum seekers' stance. Their difficulty is, however, that this philosophy puts offside much of their core voter base which is moving to the Opposition.Danny, the chart you have inserted is only up to 21 July 2010 and so doesn't include the steady increase since then. The boat arrivals have since exceeded Howard's peak (I posted an article on this at ASF a few weeks ago).
However, the chart clearly shows that the Howard's pacific solution worked. Why on earth labor would want to mess with something that worked so well is beyond me. Unless they are hoping for extra labor votes.
And there you have it, Sails. The government is trying to recapture the votes they lost to the Greens, hence the 'be kind to asylum seekers' stance. Their difficulty is, however, that this philosophy puts offside much of their core voter base which is moving to the Opposition.
She has created for herself an impossible situation with this alliance with the Greens.
AUSTRALIA'S immigration detention system is being clogged by growing numbers of rejected asylum seekers who should be sent home, the United Nations refugee agency has warned.
UNHCR regional representative Richard Towle said large numbers of people now coming through the asylum system in Australia were not refugees and ''the challenge is how to find fair and humane and effective ways of allowing them to leave this country to go home''.
Where on earth did you get such a fanciful idea that our politicians are actually motivated by what is best for Australia?I would think our policy makers should be studying the effects of certain migrant infiltration in the UK and Europe to see what is really going on instead of looking at the short term vote count. That is, if they really want the best for Australia.
This is exactly what some of us have suspected and now confirmed by the UN:
Send detainees home, says UN
(bold and underline is mine)
Where on earth did you get such a fanciful idea that our politicians are actually motivated by what is best for Australia?
They are simply motivated by their own political aspirations. To consider otherwise is to truly be deluded, Sails.
Imagine if we did it their country
We wouldn't be locked up - Australia is in the international minority in locking up people without charge.Imagine if we did it their country
At least we now know the solution to the Christmas Island problem. These people will never be law abiding citizens. The should all be returned to their home countries.
. We whinge about a few thousand
... We whinge about a few thousand
Mofra, if these were peace loving people, there wouldn't be all this anger.
But really, in all honesty, would you want several hundred of these men coming to live in your suburb? Doesn't it bother you that Ms Gillard has plans to place potentially violent people into our communities where families currently live - near our schools possibly endangering our kids???
I think Ms Gillard is running out of all credibility and these issues on Christmas island are only reminding people of her pre election promises that she would stop the boats with East Timor and then did not follow through and, instead, started bringing them to mainland suburbs.
Imagine if we did it their country
Could you provide some back up to that statement?We wouldn't be locked up - Australia is in the international minority in locking up people without charge.
The point is rather how rapidly they are increasing in numbers. Of course we in our geographically isolated situation will have fewer than those crossing the porous borders of the northern hemisphere.Pakistan has over 2 million Afghan refugees. We whinge about a few thousand
Mr Bowen has said he is considering whether charges will be laid. However, it's a pretty long bow between making such a comment in a news grab and actually doing it. My bet is that they will get no punishment. And thus, even more people who refuse to apply via the formal channels will be encouraged to come here, where all you have to do is arrive, then if you don't feel you have been admitted to the wider community as quickly as you'd like, then hey, just try to injure some security and police personnel.Yeah, I have to agree.
I have some empathy for refugees generally, but if you or I destroyed buildings and attacked Police like this we'd be charged and likely jailed.
Yeah, I have to agree.
I have some empathy for refugees generally, but if you or I destroyed buildings and attacked Police like this we'd be charged and likely jailed.
In any case we'd likely have a criminal conviction that would make it very difficult for us to gain entry to some other countries let alone gain employment.
We wouldn't be locked up - Australia is in the international minority in locking up people without charge.
Pakistan has over 2 million Afghan refugees. We whinge about a few thousand
Maybe you could have them round for a barbie
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?