So why aren't you taking the other trades its showing that you should enter PT?
Hi PT,
Very glad to have your continued posting.
Are there back-testing results for actual trades on the pairs available by this software?
As you said, it provides a "stock correlation" indicator, and we might say this is a good substitute. But not all breaks in the correlation avg might end up being a good trade, so I am curious about the actual expectancy on backtesting.
Also what is your expectancy on live trades taken so far? Have they all been a profit?
I think you may be right on the fundamentals with this pair trade skc, I checked them out and found;
CWN has fy09 p/e of 15.7, fy10 p/e of 10.50
consensus fy09 eps of 37.9, fy10 of 56.8
whereas TAH has fy09 p/e of 7.3, fy10 p/e of 8.0
consensus fy09 eps of 88.0, fy10 of 80.20
so basically analyst expectations are that CWN earnings will grow 49% over the next year whilst TAH earnings will shrink 10%, and valuations have been priced accordingly, not a bad bet to fade these expectations since if they were re-rated the stocks would be ferociously repriced, hard to believe CWN can achieve that growth rate in the current environment, plus a huge difference in applied growth rates between the two stocks, the risk is in the downside re-rating of CWN eps, I don't see it being re-rated to higher than 49%.
Interesting play to watch out.
New trade
Long NCM @ 32.28
Short SGX @ 5.63
thanks for all the posts.
just trying to comprehend.
yr graph showing the ratio of NCM/SGX seems to show a correlation in direction, even though divergence in amounts occur.
there must be something I am missing, because NCM and SGX are strongly correlated with gold price, I would have thought they would move in the same direction as the gold price, so shorting one would be counterproductive.
the chart seems to show that, I confess to being dumb but curious
thanks for all the posts.
just trying to comprehend.
yr graph showing the ratio of NCM/SGX seems to show a correlation in direction, even though divergence in amounts occur.
there must be something I am missing, because NCM and SGX are strongly correlated with gold price, I would have thought they would move in the same direction as the gold price, so shorting one would be counterproductive.
the chart seems to show that, I confess to being dumb but curious
PT,
This is the LGL/SGX ratio back through January of last year, as well as a 200-period simple moving average.
You're long the ratio, or short the spread, looking for a swing back toward the mean. So why enter here ? The ratio doesn't seem to look overbought/oversold by historical standards. What is the other criteria ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?