Exactly so, this 'simple method of investing' with no complications I discovered on forums a few years ago is what is giving me a relatively good income in retirement with very,very low fees, yet none of which was ever given as advice by fin. advisors or brokers.I've noticed a few post have been modified or deleted recently with a reference to ASIC. Putting aside specific reasons for those modifications, I really do think it is sad someone will ask a question on a forum and all they are looking for is a simple method of investing their funds. Not looking for complications or anything else and maybe a simple DCA approach into specific investment vehicles may suffice.
And what happens technically. Sorry, bro, you need to pay $3k or more to seek professional advice on these matters. But I don't have $3k as that would eat up all I have to invest. Tough, my friend, you're on your own I'm afraid.
Don't be sad, Belli
Problem is, advice given by some legal advisors, while all above board, is not always that great, at least that has been my experience.The rules are in place to protect innocent victims from being tricked.
I've noticed a few post have been modified or deleted recently with a reference to ASIC. Putting aside specific reasons for those modifications, I really do think it is sad someone will ask a question on a forum and all they are looking for is a simple method of investing their funds. Not looking for complications or anything else and maybe a simple DCA approach into specific investment vehicles may suffice.
And what happens technically. Sorry, bro, you need to pay $3k or more to seek professional advice on these matters. But I don't have $3k as that would eat up all I have to invest. Tough, my friend, you're on your own I'm afraid.
Just from reading some of the posts on this thread I feel some members may be missing out on a valuable tool for self education and assistance with making investment decisions via ASF.Don't be sad, Belli. You're not alone, we're with you; we'll continue to post and support one another. The rules are in place to protect innocent victims from being tricked. We know one another here and we know that everyone is doing their best to help...just need to pay more attention to how we phrase our sentences. Good luck and see you about.......
an egg and chicken problem ( assuming your financial adviser is working in YOUR best interest )Problem is, advice given by some legal advisors, while all above board, is not always that great, at least that has been my experience.
Excellent, Belli, treat yourself a lunch or dinner..........goodnightNo worries as I just realised it's only four sleeps until payday.
Same with every profession, the good and not so good.....got to shop around. Don't buy the cheapest; if they're cheap, ask yourself why.........cheap for a reason???Problem is, advice given by some legal advisors, while all above board, is not always that great, at least that has been my experience.
As you said in a previous post 'a real sledgehammer approach'.
treat yourslef to a lunch or dinner.
My annoyance is ASIC has, in my view, deliberately left the whole thing hanging by not providing a clear definition of "influencer" or clarifying whether general discussion on shares and the merits of one v another is OK. It is as vague as muck.
It's the equivalent of saying you'll suffer a huge penalty for speeding on a public road but there's no posted speed limit or definition of speeding.My annoyance is ASIC has, in my view, deliberately left the whole thing hanging by not providing a clear definition of "influencer" or clarifying whether general discussion on shares and the merits of one v another is OK. It is as vague as muck.
Haha, yep true. Reckon I've had a mix. You've got me recalling one mob, many years ago, occupying a few floors of expensive inner city realestate saying I could retire now (I had the bare minimum they required) but I wasn't ready to do so & was thinking b/s about their proposal. As I learnt more I realised I'd dodged a bullit there. Funnily enough the best advice I got was also the cheapest, it cost nothing except my time & learning about passive style investing from forums & great vehicles for doing this.Same with every profession, the good and not so good.....got to shop around. Don't buy the cheapest; if they're cheap, ask yourself why.........cheap for a reason???
It's the equivalent of saying you'll suffer a huge penalty for speeding on a public road but there's no posted speed limit or definition of speeding.
I'll say anything over 100 is too fast on this road but that doesn't mean the Officer who's pulled me over won't have deemed a suitable speed to be 50. Both are then on shaky ground if the other chooses to challenge it in court.
For any law to be workable, there needs to be some formal definition of what's acceptable at least in generic terms.
Suffice to say I totally agree but I don't want to turn the thread, which was started by the owner of this forum, into an ideological rant which I don't think was the intent.I find it irksome to say the least the provisions of the Corporations Act (section 766B) could be used to stiffle conversations between individuals who are not members of a corporation and who have no intention to mislead, troll, influence or receive monetary compensation by posting their views.
I hear you about the 'rant', but I will just add that it's only Australian forums, influencers etc, being targeted. We are still free to be informed/mislead from o/s forums & influencers, no problemSuffice to say I totally agree but I don't want to turn the thread, which was started by the owner of this forum, into an ideological rant which I don't think was the intent.
Suffice to say there's an abundance of for-profit financial misinformation around that's being ignored and this forum isn't the problem.
I wonder how does so called "robo advice" fit into all this?
It's the same old 'competency' and ownership story, then.
Well, obviously, if I'm not invited, I'm generally not going to be interested in your dinner.Dinner was really nice and yummy just in case anyone was wondering (doubtful.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?