websman
Illogical Vulcan
- Joined
- 1 December 2005
- Posts
- 366
- Reactions
- 0
It was a joke. I'm not trying to get kicks, I just provided a counter-point. I realised it could be intrepreted the wrong way, so I replied addressing that. You skipped or chose to ignore it, and responded to the original post by taking the most extreme interpretation you could. You didn't even ask me to clarify, which I had already done.
Your jokes suck....
Hard not to when that is the point of an intentionally bad joke. Some will get it, the rest will be offended.
Now how is this for going out on a limb.......
My fine pointy eared friend, I think that the tigers in this thread perhaps quite rightly percieve that the W.E.C. we are currently enjoying was concieved, planned, instigated and conducted by your countrymen/women.
Now as a relative minnow compared to your good selves, I would perhaps recommend that you give the medicine a little time to work before you check out of the hospital.:
O
That being said...I will let you in on a little secret..... Expect to see American troops invading Sydney harbor, tomorrow morning, at 0600 hours. Our plan is to take Sydney, by force, before continuing on to the Outback. Once we reach the Outback, we will be assisted by our allies, the Aboriginal Republican Army. That's right...You heard it here first...The Aboriginal Republican Army. Once we take Australia over, our plan is to establish the "Aboriginal Union of Australia". Get ready for it folks....The Aborigines are taking your country back by force...with the assistance of the U.S. Government!
You Yanks are just jealous we stole your 'Fattest nation on earth' crown. So pipe down lightweight:
What??? Bring on the donuts!!! We'll get that crown back!!!
The moral ground is found in the intent of the action. The US does not (currently) deliberately target innocent civilians. They are playing by the rules of war and the Geneva Conventions predominantly. Al Qaeda does not, even though they haven't signed up for any such laws, but by international standards puts them in the sin bin. The US and Coalition probably have killed a lot of civilians (maybe more) as part of military operations, but it's not the intent. Do you happen to have the figures on exactly how many civilians have been killed by each team in this conflict?
international law excuses the killing of civilians
Under what circumstances? Can you elaborate?
There are rules that belligerents must abide by.international law excuses the killing of civilians
Recent example?the united states knowingly kills civilians
There are rules that belligerents must abide by.
Recent example?
Other than part of a larger operation.
Part of a military operation by the look.
NOT a deliberate attack against civilians.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?