all risk is relative and subjective. of course there is risk in P2P. There is risk in EVERY investment.
There is pretty much nowhere that peeps can invest today and be a risk-free secured creditor ........... peeps just hide behind "too big to fail" cos they are risk adverse (and this often means also return adverse)
note: on the asx you are an unsecured creditor.
.... and for those about to tell me that bank deposits are guaranteed then answer me this - if the aussie govt had to bail out bank deposits cos something has gone very wrong with aussie banks, where do peeps think that the aussie govt is going to get that money if the entire economy has tanked badley? and if there is a bailout, could you remove the money from the bank account anyway (or is it just frozen inside the account but somehow guaranteed but untouchable? or maybe u could withdraw a maximum of $5 a week for the rest of your life) .....and if you could withdraw the guaranteed money, then where would you put that money if all the aussie banks had just collapsed?
another question, if you have invested in a asx listed coy that reports financials twice a year, then how much much do you actually know about the health of that company between those reports? (i do not include a guidance downgrade statement at 5 months into a 6 month period as being a well informed investor)
may not help much but:I'm really taken with the P toP lending model. Seems to "make sense" and offer a better deal for investors and perhaps borrowers.
But I still have nagging, unresolved questions about how the finances work for the P-P business itself.
1) Do the businesses actually create credit or only loan actual funds that are deposited? The current banking system (as I understand it) creates new credit. So a deposit base of 20M can be used to underwrite $100-150m worth of loans. The banks get return from all the loaned funds. I don't believe the P-P systems have this opportunity which clearly restricts their profitability.
2) How does the P-P make a clear return ? I appreciate there is a margin spread but it looks like only a few percent and there will be establishment fees and possibly ongoing fees. But to my eyes those sums seem unlikely to generate sufficient return to pay the staff, managers, credit analysts let alone the guys who set it up to make some serious money. I know from research that Rate Setter is yet to make a profit in UK and therefore it's Oz offshoot.
I think a point of comparison would be Credit Unions. These are tightly run financial institutions with no payouts to shareholders and, I guess, modest pay packets for management. If they can't offer the returns P-P offer what is happening ?
I want to get involved but I ask myself "Is this too good to be true ?" and "How do they make their money ?"
1. Yes, and I think the price you pay in the form of a low rate by accepting a the security of a government guaranteed deposit, it to high a price.
2. Where the small amount of added risk you take with rate setter style p2p is small but the benefits are large.
3. With rate setter, you have the protection of the provision fund, and can diversify across hundreds of loans.
NABHA
I've bought them along the way for below $70 and below $80.
Better than a term deposit and for some reason some silly buggers keep on buying them although there are better income securities about.
They are now $91.43
gg
Just as an aside, are you in anyway connected to the management of rate setter? It just appears you have an in depth knowledge of their model and structure. Not that it matters one way or the other, an investment is a personal risk/ return excercise and everyone should do their own research.Yes, and I think the price you pay in the form of a low rate by accepting a the security of a government guaranteed deposit, it to high a price.
Where the small amount of added risk you take with rate setter style p2p is small but the benefits are large.
With rate setter, you have the protection of the provision fund, and can diversify across hundreds of loans.
there was a big price rise in February ...do u recall what happened ?NABHA closed at $91.799
gg
I was wondering about your opinions on where you'd put your spare cash? I am a conservative type saver and FD had been the best option for me for the past years
I believe there was a rumour they were to be redeemed for $100.there was a big price rise in February ...do u recall what happened ?
(it suddenly outperforms products such as cba perls and i am tying to understand why that happened for my learning)
(19452 but whatevs)
First thing is @Frankieplus is to avoid advisors. If someone sells you bananas are they interested in your health or selling bananas.My advisor recently recommended a fund for me. The Vanguard Conservative Index Fund. (wholesale). I'm in the same situation as yourself as I'm looking for better than the bank but am also conservative for this particular packet of cash.
-Frank
Just as an aside, are you in anyway connected to the management of rate setter? It just appears you have an in depth knowledge of their model and structure. Not that it matters one way or the other, an investment is a personal risk/ return excercise and everyone should do their own research.
Are you talking about Rate Setter?What does the the 3 or 5 year income plan mean?
e.g. Does it mean you are committed to that length of time for the investment and you cannot withdraw the original investment until such time expires?
Everything I know about Rate Setter is either explained on their website, or was explained to me on investor webinars or the Investor Drinks nights last Xmas.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?