Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,304
- Reactions
- 11,583
Obviously different battles conducted on different grounds and justification, and against a different enemy, but I'm anticipating this to be one very long drawn out affair to keep us engaged for many years with the end result being failure.
Over the next year or so I envisage Australia raising its committment to a Brigade size force including conventional infantry, mechanised elements and maybe even the deployment of jets and helicopters including the new ARH - if they can get them off the ground, all supported by a huge logistic element including a hospital. I reckon somewhere between 3000-5000 troops. It will be a composite brigade including a NZ Bn minus/Coy plus, and possibly a chunk of either US, Canadian or Brit forces.
We will be stuck there for possibly 10 years plus.
I doubt the battle against the Taliban can be won due to the terrain and their method of fighting. And, coming into a great depression where the poor muslims of the world are going to get poorer, it will be a fertile breeding ground for youths to be radicalised and turn to fight the evil Christains.
And, it's going to get more bloody. I heard somewhere that we were embedding a number of soldiers into the Afghan Army units to provide them support. These guys are fighting on the 'front line' in much more dangerous territory.
I'm not sure if Australia is prepared...
Not sure what there is to discuss on this topic. Just putting it out there as a general comment, or if anyone else thinks this is winnable, or worthwhile venture, or is there another way we can win this war?
Is diplomacy possible?
Obviously different battles conducted on different grounds and justification, and against a different enemy, but I'm anticipating this to be one very long drawn out affair to keep us engaged for many years with the end result being failure.
Over the next year or so I envisage Australia raising its committment to a Brigade size force including conventional infantry, mechanised elements and maybe even the deployment of jets and helicopters including the new ARH - if they can get them off the ground, all supported by a huge logistic element including a hospital. I reckon somewhere between 3000-5000 troops. It will be a composite brigade including a NZ Bn minus/Coy plus, and possibly a chunk of either US, Canadian or Brit forces.
We will be stuck there for possibly 10 years plus.
I doubt the battle against the Taliban can be won due to the terrain and their method of fighting. And, coming into a great depression where the poor muslims of the world are going to get poorer, it will be a fertile breeding ground for youths to be radicalised and turn to fight the evil Christains.
And, it's going to get more bloody. I heard somewhere that we were embedding a number of soldiers into the Afghan Army units to provide them support. These guys are fighting on the 'front line' in much more dangerous territory.
I'm not sure if Australia is prepared...
Not sure what there is to discuss on this topic. Just putting it out there as a general comment, or if anyone else thinks this is winnable, or worthwhile venture, or is there another way we can win this war?
Is diplomacy possible?
Not sure Robert, I think Afghanistan is a just war. The general human values displayed by the Taliban when in power are probably a tad lower than the general values of the Western world. I believe that even if 9/11 didn't occurr the international community should have acted, as it should have in Rwanda, Bosnia, and Darfur before so many sufferred.No problem solvers in sight...only extremists.
Yeah, they need to make some effort to speak to the not so extremist, if they exist. A 'moderate' Taliban?? And then they influence the real extremists....hmmmmJust over the last week I've heard several commentators suggest that this war is simply unwinnable and the time has come to "negotiate with the Taliban".
Yeah, they need to make some effort to speak to the not so extremist, if they exist. A 'moderate' Taliban?? And then they influence the real extremists....hmmmm
Maybe we just need to find them all a job.....
Yes Robert, interferance for various reasons. Not sure if they are all for the same purpose however. The current intervention is under a much different pretext to the British and Russian invasions. I think the greater % of the current pop actually want us there. The rubbish will continue until the people committing crimes against humanity are brought to justice. If the IRC had a military arm they would be fighting this one.Where were all of invaders trained that have been interfering and killing in Afghanistan for many years?Russia,Britain, US,Nato,Australia?Which countries have been manipulating them for many years ...viewing their lives as expendable ?
Australia's hands are not clean.
Their lives are as important to them as are ours.
No problem solvers in sight....keep the rubbish going.
How dare there be any backlash against external manipulators and invaders !
Overall, I can't see how you can say that we are an extremist society. Surprising actually.This not a fight of good against evil.
More like one group of extremists versus another.
Overall, I can't see how you can say that we are an extremist society. Surprising actually.
You really should have a read up on what the Taliban implimented in Afghanistan and compare it to the west to get a hold on what is 'extremist'.
Maybe just have a look at how they treated women (as policy) for a start. Sharia law is not female friendly...
I'm still truggling with your thoughts that intervention in Afghanistan is not just.
The Taliban is an Army at war with anything forward thinking and wants all to live as the Prophet did 1400 years ago. It's at war with the West.
[/URL].
I'm with you on this, Prawn. The Iran analogy is quite justified.I have to say i disagree on this one Kennas.
Each country to their own and if the people there did not like it, then it is them who should have rose up and fought it. It is not up to another country to decide what is right/wrong/just/moral etc
EG - Why shouldnt Iran nuke all 'Westerners' as they dont agree with our 'hedonistic' lifestyle?
But thats just my opinion and i know you have a lot more experience in this area.
Someone else said, 'only the dead have seen the end of war'.
I'm still truggling with your thoughts that intervention in Afghanistan is not just.
The Taliban is an Army at war with anything forward thinking and wants all to live as the Prophet did 1400 years ago. It's at war with the West.
Have a read of their history and moral code on wiki.
Yeah, sad to think that ethnic cleansing barely drew a response from the western world, yet the unfortunate but in perspective insignificant loss of life in NY drew a full scale war.I'm with you on this, Prawn. The Iran analogy is quite justified.
Wasn't the original justification for the war in Afghanistan that Osama bin Laden was supposed to be hiding there? Even if he were, I've never understood why bombing the whole country, with all its already disadvantaged citizens , was going to find him.
It all just seemed to me to be the US striking out almost blindly in order to avenge the 9/11 attack.
I'm with you on this, Prawn. The Iran analogy is quite justified.
Wasn't the original justification for the war in Afghanistan that Osama bin Laden was supposed to be hiding there? Even if he were, I've never understood why bombing the whole country, with all its already disadvantaged citizens , was going to find him.
It all just seemed to me to be the US striking out almost blindly in order to avenge the 9/11 attack.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?