- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,760
- Reactions
- 24,739
The ABC will have her on Q & A and lateline, with a full audience of people who will tell her why they shouldn't.
Shame they can't get an audience, that are prepared to pull in their belt, but that wouldn't be good viewing.
I would recommend, putting people like Tony Jones on a normal salary, then they could really feel for the causes they support.
Maybe if Tony Jones got an audience of "normal Australians".
sptrawler said:It would be novel to see Tony do that, rather than have stacked audiences to controversial topics, it makes great viewing for the targeted audience.
Maybe if Tony Jones got an audience of "normal Australians".
You know the ones, those that pay their taxes, pay their bills, pay their childcare, pay their traffic fines, pay their electricity, pay their gas, pay their private health, put away money for their retirement.
Those that do it on a "normal wage".
It would be novel to see Tony do that, rather than have stacked audiences to controversial topics, it makes great viewing for the targeted audience.
However it seems like the main issues never get aired, and the fringe issues get a lot of tax payer funding.
I'm not saying they aren't important, but those who aren't on government handouts are just as important.IMO
noco said:Tony Jones, lies and cheats on every occasion. he manipulates the whole show from start to finish.
Aren't we talking about whether the program is biased or not?Ah yes, well they display voting intention of the audience on the screen, and it's usually about 44% LNP, 38% Labor, 12% Greens, the rest Other.
So unless you are going to call the audience liars, how else are you going to ensure an "unstacked" audience.
As far as the Muslims I saw a few Muslims in the audience, the rest weren't, so I wouldn't say it was highly "stacked" .
Aren't we talking about whether the program is biased or not?
The composition of the audience is just one of the components which will determine this.
You seem to be suggesting bias is determined on the stated voting intention of the audience.
We have no idea whether what they state is true, or whether they will allege they are, eg Liberal or Labor in order to be admitted according to what the producers are determining is required in terms of numbers.
Much more important when it comes to bias is the selection of the questions (no doubt just a very few are chosen from hundreds submitted each week), the bias (stated or not) of the panel members, and above all, the capacity of the facilitator to allow participants to run on or be cut off, according to his own bias.
So to suggest bias may be determined by the alleged political preference of the audience is less than realistic imo.
Jones is very smooth. He can quickly divert an answer that is not to his liking to a panelist whom he knows will fit his agenda.
Julia said:Jones is very smooth. He can quickly divert an answer that is not to his liking to a panelist whom he knows will fit his agenda.
Is it any wonder the ABC ratings are at an all time low......they have lost all credibility with their reporting.
They know they are biased from all the criticizem they receive and yet they still persist.
Read the comments from this link.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/...more_serious_if_abc_shows_topped_the_ratings/
This page can't be displayed
•Make sure the web address http://www.theaustralian.com.au is correct.
•Look for the page with your search engine.
•Refresh the page in a few minutes.
Fix connection problems
I don't know why but over the past few weeks, the only News sites I've been able to access is the following,
http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/andrewbolt/
The Australian returns this,
Otherwise, I have no connection problems.
Noco, do you ever actually listen to any of the in-depth current affairs that ABC Radio puts out? eg Fran Kelly's Breakfast, The World at Noon, PM?
I hear these every day and find that overall the reporting and commentary is fairly even handed.
This morning, for example, Kelly's questioning of Bill Shorten re his refusal to co-operate on the fuel excise was quite aggressive. She could not reasonably have done more to hold Labor's decision to account.
Where the ABC does show bias in a far more extreme fashion is with some of its presenters, viz particularly John Cleary on Sunday Evenings, and Tony Delroy in The Nightlife. Try to get a call in to either of these programs and the producer just hangs up on you after saying "Thanks for ringing: we'll take that as a comment". Meantime the ultra Left bias is given full reign.
Leigh Sales on 7.30 seems objective and fair enough to me.
Perhaps it's just possible that unless any presenter is as one-eyed and blinkered as Andrew Bolt, you consider them to be biased toward the Left.
I can robustly make my case in editorial meetings but ultimately, I have to present what's commissioned.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?