tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,447
- Reactions
- 6,477
Thanks Prof and T/A,
I'm not putting on any new positions until i can get a my trading capital back up to above 30k. Might be a couple of months.
During this time i'll go over all my records and try to see where i went wrong. I suspect already that i've over traded, having 20 losing trades out of 25 since May 30th.
I haven't actually got to MaxDD yet, but i've had enough to know somethings wrong.
For sometime i've been thinking about putting all my effort into systems work, but its the old 'scared of missing out' that gets me.
I really appreciate your kinds words and advice.
Cheers,
Could be part of the problem.
Why not start a trading blog here (wether you trade it or not with real $$s) and walk us through the trades with ideas from us.Log up the results and learn from the experience.
See a problem already.
Your miss inturpreting MaxDD with Maximum your prepared to lose!!!!
Max DD is a figure calculated from peak to valley drawdowns from within a system over a period of time.Its the maximum your methodology has retraced at anyone time through out the testing period.
A figure you use as a benchmark to see wether your method trades ouside the boundaries tested.
2 VERY different things.
Hell normally I'm referred to as an egotistical self opinionated GURU! (Not by you).
...if 97% of traders fail, I find it really hard to believe that there's even a forum here talking about trading, or that an entire section of the daily newspaper is dedicated to stocks! If that were the case, wouldn't we all just put money in the bank, then 100% of us succeed by making a tiny bit of interest!
Whats the 'fail' criteria here?
Whats the 'fail' criteria here?
...if 97% of traders fail, I find it really hard to believe that there's even a forum here talking about trading, or that an entire section of the daily newspaper is dedicated to stocks! If that were the case, wouldn't we all just put money in the bank, then 100% of us succeed by making a tiny bit of interest!
Whats the 'fail' criteria here?
Can,
Irrespective of how good a trading plan you (or for anybody else, for that matter) have, there will always be drawdowns in your trading. This is part and parcel of trading. Sometimes, these drawdowns will occur right at the start where you can least afford to lose and is emotionally challenging. Other times, it may come when you have accuulated a lot of profit, in which case, drawdowns can more easily digested. If your trading plan has been extensively tested and you have confidence that it has positive expectancy then, I believe, the correct action is to persevere with it and allow that positive expectancy to play itself out. Psychologically this can be very difficult, particulaly after recent bad performances, which is a major reason why 97% of traders are failures. It takes more mental strength than you can imagine. Having this "bullet proof" psychology together with the ability to look long term in the face of short term adversity is what separates the "winners" from the "losers". Such confidence can only come from extensive testing of your systems so that you know its characteristics back to front, whereby the results would have given you a lot of ideas as to what to expect from your system.
Tech,
I am curious as to why you and a few other people often mention "overtrading" as possibly a problem. Surely, if your system possesses positive expectancy, you would surely want to trade it "until the cows come home". If after a large number of trades, your system is not performing as you had expected, or indeed making a loss, then your system does not have positive expectancy. A positive expectancy system will always generate a positive return if you pump enough transactions through it. To me, it is not possible to have a system with positive expectancy and still suffer a loss as a result of overtrading, unless we are talking making too many mistakes in carrying out your trading plan as a result of the sheer number of transactions, which is a different issue altogether.
Just my
Depends on timeframe.For a total beginner though timing entry is crucial. If you started last week...ouch. If you started yesterday
That was my assumption Canaussieuk.(Discretionary)
Depends on timeframe.
Entry is one of the LEAST important components.
Positive expectancy and R/R ratio's are KNOWNS that are related to the numbers which your trading methodology returns
That was my assumption Canaussieuk.(Discretionary)
Depends on timeframe.
Entry is one of the LEAST important components.
Exactly.If you are trading short time frames with leverage or derivatives everything matters. Then if it doesn't work out you have the satisfaction of knowing you did the best you could in the areas within your control. Doing excellent work and aiming to trade well is where the edge is.
Cheers
Happytrader
In fact the exit is defined by the entry.
Theres no way i can test my Descret. system ,but its right out of Nick's course. I really do suspect that if i'm more patient, and wait for higher probability opportunities and risk less, then i would do ok through this volitility. But until my coach (Nick, for another 2 months) comes back from AL i'll stand aside, lick my wounds and prepare for the tax man.
Live and learn, i'm very fortunate that i'm single with no dependants, living away from home saving every penny i earn to learn the hard way.
Got a few more years left yet.
Cheers,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?