- Joined
- 12 April 2007
- Posts
- 999
- Reactions
- 0
Businesswomen question 2020 panel mix
Updated 3 hours 8 minutes ago
Cate Blanchett is the only woman named as part of the 10-member panel that will choose people to attend the 2020 summit. (AFP: Timothy A Clary)
Actress Cate Blanchett is the only woman named as part of the Government-appointed 10-member panel that will choose people to attend the summit in April.
The chairwoman of Harris Farm Markets, Katherine Harris, says it is a lopsided board that will only be able to represent half of the population.
"It's not just that we're not getting different points of view but it's also that we're not getting role models," she said.
"All the young women coming out of school and at universities - they look up at this group of the supposedly 1,000 great thinkers in Australia and nine out of 10 of them are all men."
Ms Harris says she expected more from Mr Rudd.
"He's got his successful wife. He understands that most women are not actually at home looking after the grandchildren or the children, they've unfortunately got lots of other jobs as well. And this just ... is just such a shock."
Executive director of lobby group Women on Boards, Claire Braund, fears an under-representation of women on the summit leadership group will also lead to too many men and not enough women among the 1,000 summit delegates.
"This sends a message to young people, to future leaders that women are not equal, not good enough, not on our government's radar and not going to be considered," she said.
"I have to ask the question when I saw this list, why is it that the top 11 people, the first in the class, don't include at least one woman of substance in the areas of science, economics, health, rural affairs, governance, sustainability? Is there not one other woman with the qualifications and experience who can join Cate Blanchett and assume a leadership role in this important summit?
"How are we going to bring women, 51 per cent of the population, into this critical discussion that we're having about Australia's future?
The other 10 members are all men and from Anglo-Saxon backgrounds, apart from Aboriginal surgeon, Kelvin Kong.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/02/26/2172724.htm
Why is the gender of this appointments committee important?
Obviously.Obviously the male ego at work.
Isn't the selection of a group of people based on gender (to ensure an exactly even split, you'd need to select people with gender as a relevant input) nearly the exact definition of discrimination - the very thing you're claiming to be upset about?Talk to the females in your life (preferrably a cross section) and see if they think it is a media beatup
Assuming the members of the committee were selected randomly from the Australian population and assuming that is made up of exactly 50/50 males and females, the probability that the committee was made up of half males and half females was LESS THAN 25%.or there is reason to be concerned about issues of inequality, discrimination etc.
I hate to break it to you, Kennas was taking the p!ss. There is no greater issue here. You're making a mountain out of what is statistically a molehill. It'd be worth revisiting when the wider group is selected, but until then, it is meaningless.The greater issue is inclusion of the talents of all types of Australians in the decision-making process. Kennas mentioned some of these groups in his post.
Just as well you don't believe it, because if you did, the inference would be quite flawed.Secondly, the inference one could make from the current composition of the panel is that women and people from ethnic groups make up less than ten pecent of Australia's best and brightest. I don't believe that for a second.
Yea, why ruin a good story with the truthYou can play around with figures, if you like. Maybe, that is something some men are inclined to do. It is very simplistic, imo. Maybe some women and men take into account other issues.
I hate to break it to you, Kennas was taking the p!ss.
You're making a mountain out of what is statistically a molehill. It'd be worth revisiting when the wider group is selected, but until then, it is meaningless.
You can play around with figures, if you like. Maybe, that is something some men are inclined to do. It is very simplistic, imo. Maybe some women and men take into account other issues. Pretty insulting too, to those who make up those groups which would be over 50% of this society.
I heard Ms Harris with this comment on 'PM' this evening and my only thought was "I wonder what especially qualifies Cate Blanchett as an actor to be on such an august panel?" The gender balance didn't cross my mind.
I love the way minority groups... and in particular feminists, put forth the notion that issues from a certain group, can only be represented by that particular group.
I guess without women there, it wont just be a talk/ bitch fest after all!
All men are inherently sexist, didn't you take high school English?I love the way minority groups... and in particular feminists, put forth the notion that issues from a certain group, can only be represented by that particular group.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?