Thought Howard was the specialist at this?
He was and I have commented on this in the past.Thought Howard was the specialist at this?
http://www.alp.org.au/federal-government/news/updated-net-budget-impact-of-election-policies-(18/Victorian Regional Rail Link – re-phasing of project milestone payments
The Gillard Labor Government will also re-phase funds available for the Victorian Regional Rail Link to reflect completion of delivery milestones for the project. The final payment will be increased from $100 million to $300 million and will be made upon the project’s scheduled completion in late 2014. Funding of $80 million in 2012-13 and $120 million in 2013-14 will be re-phased into 2014-15 for this purpose.
The overall funding for the project remains unchanged and this change will not affect the scheduled delivery of the project.
1. Gender. Many women will not have the heart to vote out Australia's first woman prime minister after barely two months in office, a humiliation of historic proportions and enough to give pause.
2. The Greens. As if the Greens would ever do a preference deal with the Liberals. The Greens' preference agreement with Labor, plus compulsory preferential voting, means a vote for the Greens in an election for the House of Representatives can serve as a protest vote against Labor but still end up as a vote for Labor.
3. Marginal pork barrels. Every government leverages the advantages of office to deliver spending to targeted marginal electorates and the Gillard government is true to form.
-
4. Victorian provincialism. Tony Abbott is from Sydney. Gillard is from Melbourne. In Victoria, enough said. The Liberals will lose seats in Victoria, offsetting the anti-Labor mood in NSW.
5. Joe Hockey. There is a limit to how much damage a party can sustain before regenerating. Losing three leaders in two years, then the retirements of Peter Costello and Senator Nick Minchin, who were the de facto leaders of the Liberals, cut into the muscle and bone of the party. If Costello and Minchin were still in place the Liberals' economic credibility would be robust and Labor's leadership stunt would be in serious trouble. Hockey's amiable appearance belies a hardened factional warrior who lacks the gravitas one expects of a federal treasurer. Andrew Robb, yes. Malcolm Turnbull, yes. Peter Costello, in spades. Hockey is lead in Abbott's saddlebags.
6. The pie-eaters. Finally, we get to the most structural and disturbing aspect of the election, the growing primacy of the pie-eaters. As the recent British election showed, when sections of a country become addicted to government spending (Scotland and Wales), the electorate will vote out of self-interest and vote for the party of big government. That is, vote Labor, no matter how bad the record.
Why Labor will win;
6. The pie-eaters. Finally, we get to the most structural and disturbing aspect of the election, the growing primacy of the pie-eaters. As the recent British election showed, when sections of a country become addicted to government spending (Scotland and Wales), the electorate will vote out of self-interest and vote for the party of big government. That is, vote Labor, no matter how bad the record.
Calliope,
Pie eaters? Please explain.. I recall seeing a news clip the other day which featured your beloved Tony... eating a meat pie. Does that mean he will vote for Julia.
Had one myself on Sunday. Am I now a "pie eater"? Does that mean I must vote for Julia?
The power of the pies, are they taking over from cocaine as a drug of choice. ? Will they be banned? I was told recently that if I go to the AFL grand final to take a packed lunch as there weren't going to be any "pies"there. That's taking drugs in sport a little too far isn't it.
6. The pie-eaters. Finally, we get to the most structural and disturbing aspect of the election, the growing primacy of the pie-eaters. As the recent British election showed, when sections of a country become addicted to government spending (Scotland and Wales), the electorate will vote out of self-interest and vote for the party of big government. That is, vote Labor, no matter how bad the record.
You obviously didn't read the link.
It's not just the spending on middle class welfare - it's the fact that it is too hot an issue politically for real reform in the area, so we're almost assured of being stuck with it until a leader with real courage of conviction (ruling out Abbott & Gillard) makes it to the top of one of the two major political parties.If both sides can't at some point resist ever increasing spending on middle class welfare, we could potentially go in that direction regardless of who is in power.
Gillard has her current boy friend on display at the launch. And her old role model.
You would have to hope that the voting public is asking about this very breathtaking piece of hypocrisy.Can the real Julia Gillard please stand up and explain why in her election speech she quoted Kevin Rudd as a great achiever.
On the 23rd June she politically assassinated Rudd because she said Kevin Rudd and his Government had lost it's way.
If he is now a such great achiever, why was he replaced by his assassin?
You would have to hope that the voting public is asking about this very breathtaking piece of hypocrisy.
I've been waiting for some journalist to comment on the fact that the damaging leaks have stopped now that Mr Rudd has been welcomed back to the fold, rising bravely from his sick bed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?