explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,198
I just cannot believe that people will try to give Gillard another 3 years to do whatever after all the same Labor Machinery with just different mouthpiece could not do in 2 and ¾ years.
I am not too bright sometimes...
You'd all be a lot less frustrated if you followed the greens where we may one day be able to bring about some change with our own input too.
Or perhaps more because the Labor machine observed the diminishing polls and decided he must be the cause. If the polls hadn't panicked them, they wouldn't have cared what his style was. Julia was going to save them from the failure of Kevin, but lo, it didn't seem to be working, so down on their knees they go to plead with failed Kevin to stop his damaging leaks, and come back on board. The Australian voter is not so stupid that they don't see all this.Krudd failed and was kicked out because he was a one man band.
Far be it from me to defend Mr Rudd, but it has been widely reported that the very action which began Rudd's demise - the axing of the ETS - was insisted on by Gillard, Swan and Tanner, Rudd himself being reluctant to not stick with it.Everything Gillard et al. did was dictated under the autocratic oversight of Rudd. So how can anyone yet judge Gillard.
You can't excuse Ms Gillard from responsibility for any of Labor's decisions, Explod.
To look for the best in the best of all possible worlds, Panglossian style, may be a nice characteristic, but imo it's leading you to a lack of connection with reality.
Wasn't it a 4-person kitchen cabinet ?Krudd failed and was kicked out because he was a one man band.
She has rushed to the polls with ill-considered ideas of her own as leader.Everything Gillard et al. did was dictated under the autocratic oversight of Rudd. So how can anyone yet judge Gillard.
Have you squirreled away some hard assets (gold, commodities, property etc) for your grandchildren in case they find the grass not to be as green on the other side as you imagine ?You'd all be a lot less frustrated if you followed the greens where we may one day be able to bring about some change with our own input too.
How about telling us what these changes are, that you would like the Greens to bring about, and what would be your input?
The Australian has backed off a little from an article this morning suggesting a Galaxy poll put the 2PP vote was in favour of the Coalition.I said yesterday that the Australian was positioning itself to editorialise in favour of Labor.
http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/mumble/index.php/theaustralian/comments/galaxy/Ignore the reports that put the Coalition ahead on the national two party preferred vote ...... 51.4 to 48.6. Any national calculation from these numbers has Labor ahead around 51 to 49. (Antony Green explains how someone stuffed up.)
drsmith: Have you squirreled away some hard assets (gold, commodities, property etc) for your grandchildren in case they find the grass not to be as green on the other side as you imagine ?
A bet each way is not a luxury that would be afforded to most Australians under the Greens.You betcha,
Financial markets would tip the bucket or at least that would be the Greens excuse.you dont think a Greens party that makes it eventually into government will succeed by tipping the bucket all the way over do you.
If both sides can't at some point resist ever increasing spending on middle class welfare, we could potentially go in that direction regardless of who is in power.Is it possible this U-Tube on the future of Australia under Labor 2010 to 2013 could be right.
http://blogs.news.com.au/couriermai...ments/galaxy_queensland_could_finish_gillard/
Financial markets would tip the bucket or at least that would be the Greens excuse.
Don't miss Mark Latham on 60 Minutes ch 9 7.30 pm tomorrow evening. I think it may be explosive.
Latham wants revenge on both Gillard and Rudd as the hatred is very evident.
In that case I won't be watching it.What a fizzer Mak Latham was on 60 minutes.
The anti-climax to the whole show was Mark Latham suggesting everybody submit a blank ballot paper in the box on the 21st.
The anti-climax to the whole show was Mark Latham suggesting everybody submit a blank ballot paper in the box on the 21st.
If both sides can't at some point resist ever increasing spending on middle class welfare, we could potentially go in that direction regardless of who is in power.
The only potential difference with the ALP/Greens is that it may happen quicker.
Agree. It was pathetic in every way, made him look like even more of a loser, and would not have damaged either major party imo, though doubtless that was his intent.What a fizzer Mak Latham was on 60 minutes.
The anti-climax to the whole show was Mark Latham suggesting everybody submit a blank ballot paper in the box on the 21st.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?