Recent content by Richard Dale

... (Crickets)

Skate - the "excercise" was on "income stocks" but you have completely ignored dividends in all of your reports, so your conclusion is flawed. Going back to the original list and based upon your start date of 2024-01-22 (and using open price), here's the results, inclusive of dividends (total...

I'm going to call bull**** on your excuse. Upon detection, your additional trials were cancelled, yet you kept siging up. You sought to obtain a service without paying and tried to use various methods to bypass detection, entering in fake details, different email addresses and fake phone...

Since this is a "dump it here" topic - I am also going to dump. I have been reliably informed by my staff that a member of this site, and quite likely a participant in this thread, has been tring to take advantage of Norgate Data, by undertaking multiple "free trials" of survivorship-bias free...

Cheap

You clearly can't make any consistent decisions with your historically unverifiable approach (with motherhood vibes). Quid pro quo - lol.

Aka "I'm going to supplement my decision process with information from an opaque source with undefined sources with varying degress of unknowable staleness" Good luck! LOL.

@dis4ever - Yep, the blind faith of asking any GenAI to provide any sort of financial "advice" (aka stock selections) is akin to putting your trust in a model that will postdictively change without you knowing because it has newer samples. It's akin to somebody saying (after the fact) that they...

Views on the perceived lack of a rational/proveable methodology/process are good. You need to reflect on that. PS - Don't post some AI-generated (or otherwise) motherhood statements responding to this.

@dis4ever my comment "So, you put your trust in a indeterminate stock selection model that varies over time, using a set of input data that you have no idea about how recent/stale the data incorporates, according to rules you can't possibly discern." was directed at Skate, not at you!

There will always be a set of "lucky" traders in any defined market period. The real holy grail is: Over the long term, to increase your equity at a rate that significantly exceeds inflation with drawdowns that are demonstrably less than the broad market fluctuations.

ALL = S&P/ASX 20 ANZ = S&P/ASX 20 BHP = S&P/ASX 20 CBA = S&P/ASX 20 CSL = S&P/ASX 20 FMG = S&P/ASX 20 GMG = S&P/ASX 20 MQG = S&P/ASX 20 RIO = S&P/ASX 20 TCL = S&P/ASX 20 COH = S&P/ASX 50 CPU = S&P/ASX 50 DXS = S&P/ASX 50 MPL = S&P/ASX 50 SHL = S&P/ASX 50 WDS = S&P/ASX 50 ALD = S&P/ASX 100 JBH...

So, you put your trust in a indeterminate stock selection model that varies over time, using a set of input data that you have no idea about how recent/stale the data incorporates, according to rules you can't possibly discern. Good luck! LOL.

I think most aren't understanding why he posts absolute dollar figures rather than percentages. It's to get an emotive response from you and educate you that emotive responses have no place in systematic trading. As a percentage he wouldn't even be down double digits on that intramonth...

It's quite doable for not too much money. Either pay $ per computing hour or build your own. I built my own multi-server GPU cluster (28 GPUs) for ML/LLM tasks. It uses up a few (!) watts (about 6000) when cranking!