- Joined
- 8 April 2008
- Posts
- 871
- Reactions
- 0
I mean, the thread is titled "TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER".........What is the point of having a leader in the United Nations if he has no pull on these radical nations......what is the point if our top UN leader has lost control?
We need someone in that top job with the balls to stand over these vicious radical countries, stamp out terrorism and radical religious groups.
The UN Leader has never lost control because he has never had control.
A leader cannot be strong, decisive and effective without real power and real authority, which is precisely what the UN does not have.
Of course the world has seen some strong, decisive and effective leaders. Saddam Hussein was one. How about Marcos, Suharto, Gaddafi, Mubarak. But there is not much respect around for the these ex-leaders. Why? Because they became strong, decisive and effective for themselves only - i.e. for their own egos and personal gain.
Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela were exceptional leaders each in their own way, but I doubt the world will ever see the likes of them again.