- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,594
- Reactions
- 7,472
On Thursday Pope Francis will be officially releasing his Encyclical on Climate Change the environment and world poverty. In fact it has already been leaked by insiders who are trying to damage the launch.
There are some quick interesting comments already on the encyclical. George Monbiot has started as a strong supporter.
I think the Pope has created an excellent pitch pulling together climate change, the environment as a whole and the need to address world poverty as a unity package. It is not an either/or option.
Thoughts ?
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/16/pope-encyclical-value-of-living-world
There are some quick interesting comments already on the encyclical. George Monbiot has started as a strong supporter.
I think the Pope has created an excellent pitch pulling together climate change, the environment as a whole and the need to address world poverty as a unity package. It is not an either/or option.
Thoughts ?
The Pope can see what many atheist greens will not
George Monbiot
t
Pope Francis reminds us that our relationship to the natural world is about love, not just goods and services
@GeorgeMonbiot
Wednesday 17 June 2015 04.39 AEST
Who wants to see the living world destroyed? Who wants an end to birdsong, bees and coral reefs, the falcon’s stoop, the salmon’s leap? Who wants to see the soil stripped from the land, the sea rimed with rubbish?
No one. And yet it happens. Seven billion of us allow fossil fuel companies to push shut the narrow atmospheric door through which humanity stepped. We permit industrial farming to tear away the soil, banish trees from the hills, engineer another silent spring. We let the owners of grouse moors, 1% of the 1%, shoot and poison hen harriers, peregrines and eagles. We watch mutely as a small fleet of monster fishing ships trashes the oceans.
Why are the defenders of the living world so ineffective? It is partly, of course, that everyone is complicit; we have all been swept off our feet by the tide of hyperconsumption, our natural greed excited, corporate propaganda chiming with a will to believe that there is no cost. But perhaps environmentalism is also afflicted by a deeper failure: arising possibly from embarrassment or fear, a failure of emotional honesty.
‘We have all been swept off our feet by the tide of hyperconsumption, our natural greed excited, corporate propaganda chiming with a will to believe that there is no cost’.
I have asked meetings of green-minded people to raise their hands if they became defenders of nature because they were worried about the state of their bank accounts. Never has one hand appeared. Yet I see the same people base their appeal to others on the argument that they will lose money if we don’t protect the natural world.
Such claims are factual, but they are also dishonest: we pretend that this is what animates us, when in most cases it does not. The reality is that we care because we love. Nature appealed to our hearts, when we were children, long before it appealed to our heads, let alone our pockets. Yet we seem to believe we can persuade people to change their lives through the cold, mechanical power of reason, supported by statistics.
I see the encyclical by Pope Francis, which will be published on Thursday, as a potential turning point. He will argue that not only the physical survival of the poor, but also our spiritual welfare depends on the protection of the natural world; and in both respects he is right.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/16/pope-encyclical-value-of-living-world