- Joined
- 10 December 2012
- Posts
- 3,632
- Reactions
- 9
That is debatable, whether you like it or not everything (other than electronic data) is transported.
We move it by road, air, sea or rail. The shortest way from Asia to Adelaide is through Darwin.
If carbon taxing becomes a norm and as you are pro carbon reduction, the Darwin Adelaide rail link becomes essential.
The Adelaide freight movement study, forecasts a threefold increase in freight from WA - Darwin via Adelaide by 2030.
My guess is that is conservative, if weather extremes change as per the greenies, much more freight will be transported overland. Sea transport,especially to Asia will be kept to a minimum distance, just my guess.
As far as the NBN goes, I'm getting a box on the wall.
So your argument seems to be to build the capacity before it's actually required? Sounds rather like the NBN, only on current take up rates for the NBN it seems most are quite happy to pay the small increase to have the highest speed plans compared to the low speed ones. You can survey people to see what they will do, but when they actually part with the $$ you get to see the true demand for a product. People making a conscious decision to use the NBN has been far higher than comparable rollouts around the world. There's plenty of demand for fast reliable broadband.
I dare say the money spend for the ADE DRW rail link would have provided a pay back by now if it had been spent on straightening the rail line linking BNE SYD MEL to allow faster freight transport.
I wasn't able to find the tripling forecast you mention. The only tripling I could see was for freight into and out from Adelaide which includes the fright to MEL and PER along with DRW:
One key reason for forecasting the rail freight task was to understand the future importance of Adelaide as distinct from Perth (and to a much lesser extent Darwin) as a destination and origin market for railed freight.