- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 7,102
- Reactions
- 6
So which of the three were they committing whilst confined within the detention centre?
The lot.
So which of the three were they committing whilst confined within the detention centre?
OK. Well if you can rationalise that, one can see how you reach your other conclusions. Carry on.The lot.
OK. Well if you can rationalise that, one can see how you reach your other conclusions. Carry on.
Thanks derty. Terrorism was around long before they had bombs and the main weapon of intimidation and destruction was arson.
um, Guy Fawkes tried to blow up parliament with barrels of gunpowder. i.e. a BOMB. It was he that was burnt.Yes Calliope, remember GUY FAWKES (think that is how one spells it).
Any way, perhaps derty would like to swap places with Chris Bowen. Clean up the excreta left on the roof at villawood.
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...-hard-to-stomach/story-e6frerdf-1226045868641
derty, do you think the protestors should be allowed to stay up on the roof, having food brought to them etc?
If we were to transpose the situation to inmates of an Australian jail behaving similarly, would we be tolerating a similar situation? Wouldn't the police pretty smartly be directed to bring them down?
I'm not suggesting by asking you this question that you have any responsibility in government or opposition policy. It's just a question I'm a bit surprised has not been pursued by the media, and I'm interested in what your view would be.
If the protesters that were on the roof were the same ones that burnt and damaged the centre then they should have been brought down and locked up pending charges.On my scale what these detainees did was commit criminal acts. It should void their application process and they should be deported.
...If they were just up there protesting, not causing damage and not endangering anyone else I can't see a problem with them sitting up there and carrying on. Half the problem is the amount of attention the media gives them. If they were simply ignored they would be off the roof pretty quickly.....
I jumped into the discussion as I objected to Calliope characterising these guys as terrorists and noco likening it to 911 and now it has been reduced to me being pro them pooing on the roof?? It's great how these things metamorphose. SheeshReally? That roof is going to get pretty smelly - everyone's gotta go to the loo...
So their excrement goes into the gutters or elsewhere - isn't that a health hazzard? Pretty disgusting in anyone's books.
I jumped into the discussion as I objected to Calliope characterising these guys as terrorists and noco likening it to 911 and now it has been reduced to me being pro them pooing on the roof?? It's great how these things metamorphose. Sheesh![]()
That's the crux of the matter.Labor have a lot to answer for in encouraging dangerous migration by desperate people.
I jumped into the discussion as I objected to Calliope characterising these guys as terrorists and noco likening it to 911 and now it has been reduced to me being pro them pooing on the roof?? It's great how these things metamorphose. Sheesh![]()
If they were just up there protesting, not causing damage and not endangering anyone else I can't see a problem with them sitting up there and carrying on.
I jumped into the discussion as I objected to Calliope characterising these guys as terrorists and noco likening it to 911 and now it has been reduced to me being pro them pooing on the roof?? It's great how these things metamorphose. Sheesh![]()
The Immigration Department has confirmed that three Christmas Island detainees convicted after riots in 2009 were subsequently granted a visa late last year
We vs. themFirst of they come and beg asylum. We open our chests both mentally and physically.
Then they rob us. Multiply their numbers. Take our kids inheritance and hard earned tax payers funds. Politicians become extra kind to them for their own glory.
Why stop with just shooting these asylum seekers? Why not go on with shooting all the other people that have come to our country in the past 60 odd years as I'm sure some of them steal our hard earned tax payers funds??? All the indians, pakistanis, malays, chinese etc etc.One alternative also could be , just let the police 'accidentally' shoot one of the destructive persons - no will be destructing or seeking asylum to Australia.
We vs. them
Are these just blind prejudices or are these based in anyone's reality but your own??
Why stop with just shooting these asylum seekers? Why not go on with shooting all the other people that have come to our country in the past 60 odd years as I'm sure some of them steal our hard earned tax payers funds??? All the indians, pakistanis, malays, chinese etc etc.
Actually, that's not what I said at all. I was pointing out that Miner was making brash generalisations about a very large group of people he knows nothing of.Maybe your idea has merit, let anybody in, get rid of customs and federal police, just have a free for all.
'Self analysis'? Not sure what you mean here. People are clearly concerned, but there's quite a large difference between analysis and brazen bigotry.Jeez doctorj a bit of self analysis wouldn't go astray.
The reality is most western countries are becomming increasingly concerned by the influx of illegal asylum seekers.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.