- Joined
- 28 May 2006
- Posts
- 9,985
- Reactions
- 2
ok - One fallacy would surely be that there is such a thing as the mating of two 100% purebreeds of any dog species.
Note how vague the definition is when it comes to quantifying this "purity"..
... "from unmixed lineage" ?? - what does that really mean? how far back? - and what penalty are you paying in inbreeding for instance?
I mean Queen Elizabeth is a right mixture of "breeds" for starters...
and the only reason they plot her family tree only a few generations is that the tree gets a bit errr interwoven back there a bit ... Victoria marrying her cousin etc. Still - Lizzie is ok
Usually nature forgives and forgets it seems lol.
Note how vague the definition is when it comes to quantifying this "purity"..
... "from unmixed lineage" ?? - what does that really mean? how far back? - and what penalty are you paying in inbreeding for instance?
The definition of a "purebred" in the dictionary is the following - "bred for many generations from a member of a recognized breed or strain n : a pedigreed animal of unmixed lineage". According to the AKC a purebred dog means, "the sire and dam of a dog are members of a recognized breed and that the ancestry of a dog consists of the same breed over many generations"
I mean Queen Elizabeth is a right mixture of "breeds" for starters...
and the only reason they plot her family tree only a few generations is that the tree gets a bit errr interwoven back there a bit ... Victoria marrying her cousin etc. Still - Lizzie is ok