Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

MEE - Metex Resources

Status
Not open for further replies.

bigdog

Retired many years ago
Joined
19 July 2006
Posts
8,154
Reactions
5,535
Top of the pile is Metex Resources, which has a uranium deposit in Italy, although Mr Grigor believes the resource needs to double in size to make it worth developing. But with Metex shares trading at 6.1c on Tuesday (the day on which all price calculations were based), the shares offered good upside.

Above Reported Australian Oct 27 2006
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20651857-643,00.html

Uranium's glow waning, investors warned
Robin Bromby
27 October 2006

URANIUM investors beware: there aren't many bargains left in the sector.

This is the conclusion reached by Far East Capital's Warwick Grigor after he analysed more than 50 uranium stocks listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. The size of the known resource, the market capitalisation per pound of uranium in the ground and exploration results were all examined.

Stocks where there is still value to be found at present prices are pretty thin on the ground.

Top of the pile is Metex Resources, which has a uranium deposit in Italy, although Mr Grigor believes the resource needs to double in size to make it worth developing. But with Metex shares trading at 6.1c on Tuesday (the day on which all price calculations were based), the shares offered good upside.

"It is a cautiously and competently managed company that would be one of the lower risk ways to play the uranium market," the report says.

Nova Energy gets a "sound" rating because its projects have real production possibilities once the political opposition in Western Australia is resolved.

Summit Resources has been one of Far East's preferred uranium plays for some time, having, in Queensland, one of the largest undeveloped uranium resources in Australia.

Mr Grigor expects Paladin Resources to make a move on Summit, following the latter's successful takeover of Valhalla Uranium, which owns half of Summit's main deposits.

Mr Grigor has a big stake in uranium. He is chairman of Monaro Mining, which is in Krygyzstan; a director of Peninsula Mining, which is looking in South Australia and South Africa; and a shareholder in Western Metals.

All three, as would be expected, get a "good" grading at Far East Capital - Monaro because it is seen as one of the cheapest potential producers, Peninsula because of the potential of its grassroots projects, and Western Metals because its ex-WMC Resources management team has picked up uranium ground in Tanzania.

The report - "What is the value in the Uranium Sector?" - says uranium prices up to $US100/lb (nearly double the present $US56/lb spot) could be reached in a year or two, allowing many marginal projects to come on stream.

But Mr Grigor says investors should pick out the companies with sizeable deposits with the potential for between 25,000 tonnes and 50,000 tonnes of uranium.

He warns against placing too much emphasis on a few good intersections or assays.

"Beware of beat-ups designed to drive the share price," Mr Grigor says.

Tricks that companies use to get a good headline for a stock exchange release include drilling right beside an old hole that had good grades - which guaranteed a good intercept but doesn't add any new information about the deposit - and reassaying previous drilling as a substitute for getting stuck into detailed drilling programs.

There are plenty of uranium stocks that don't appeal to Mr Grigor, who charts these and many other resources juniors daily.

Compass Resources, which has the old Rum Jungle project in the Northern Territory, had been taken to unrealistic levels because US funds bought aggressively.

Uranium Exploration Australia is another to get the thumbs-down.

Bannerman Resources has been running since August and its $152 million market cap is looking "a bit heady".

Toro Energy, while having good projects, has too much expectation built into its 74c share price.

Aurora Minerals, which is looking for uranium projects, gets dismissed: "There is nothing compelling here."
 
SMH report Oct 28, 2006 for Metex (MEE) issued was not glowing and shot down the Far East report per next para:

THE no-uranium movement in the Italian Alps is celebrating a victory over the Australian exploration group Metex Resources. Metex was seeking a permit to explore the uranium potential of the Valgoglio-Novazza zone, in a valley 85 kilometres north-east of Milan.

I watched Metex yesterday closed Thursday at 0.073 and reached high of 0.9 and closed at 0.082.

Oct 27 volume at 6,787,609 was the highest since Dec 2005

Also, there has been no ANN from Metex to ASX

http://www.smh.com.au/news/business...grazie-to-metex/2006/10/27/1161749311836.html


Full article:
Lombardy minister's no grazie to Metex
Desmond O'Grady in Rome
October 28, 2006

THE no-uranium movement in the Italian Alps is celebrating a victory over the Australian exploration group Metex Resources. Metex was seeking a permit to explore the uranium potential of the Valgoglio-Novazza zone, in a valley 85 kilometres north-east of Milan.

The Italian energy authority ENI located uranium there in the late 1970s but dropped further work because Italy voted against building nuclear reactors.

In a statement to the Australian Stock Exchange in September, Metex managing director Ian Walker said the area contained an estimated 870,000 tonnes of material which was expected to produce 130,000 tonnes of uranium, with an in situ value estimated at almost $200 million.

A Metex press release described the Novazza site as the cornerstone of our new energy policy. The news produced a pick-up in the Metex share price although it subsequently fell back to around 6.5c - only to close at 8.2c on Friday.

But the Valgoglio local council, which includes Novazza (together they have fewer than 1000 inhabitants), voted against the Metex project. And on Tuesday the Lombardy Region Minister for the Environment, Mario Pagnoncelli, announced he had given it the thumbs down.

We want to close the question once and for all, Mr Pagnoncelli said. Last week I asked the Metex representatives to withdraw their request but they have not responded.

We've got projects of our own, Valgoglio mayor Augusto Bonardo said by phone. We settled this issue years ago and don't want to reopen it for an anachronistic and dangerous project - uranium mining entails health hazards and environmental damage.

The uranium project was discussed at several public meetings. A no-uranium committee was formed and people were invited to email their disapproval to Metex. It is claimed that 500 did so and a petition was presented to Mr Pagnoncelli with 2500 signatures opposing the project.

The well-organised and nationally based Legambiente movement, with ideals close to those of the Greens, has been crucial to the opposition movement, using arguments such as that radon gas from uranium is already present in considerable quantities in the zone, which has high cancer rates.

Yet several at the public meetings spoke in favour of the Metex project, and there is a growing impatience with the not-in-my-backyard mentality which blocks many development projects in Italy.

A Valgoglio councillor who was absent when it voted against the project, Amedeo Pirola, says the earlier site exploration did no damage, provided work and resulted in construction of a useful road. He pointed out that the Metex application was only for exploration, not extraction.
 
METEX ASX ANN just posted

http://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/showAnnouncementPDF.do?idsID=00670762

METEX, CSIRO EXPAND UNDERGROUND COAL
GASIFICATION VENTURE INTO INDIA
CARBON ENERGY PTY LTD LOOKS TO INDIA FOR UNDERGROUND COAL GASIFICATION PROJECTS
Carbon Energy Pty Ltd, a company jointly owned by listed resource company Metex Resources Ltd (ASX:MEE) and CSIRO, has added further momentum to the international development of its innovative process for the gasification of underground coal deposits for power generation through a significant new development venture in India in collaboration with India’s second largest coal producer.

Carbon Energy has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with Singareni Collieries Company Limited to cooperate in the investigation for joint development of underground coal gasification in Singareni coal areas within the Godavari Valley coalfields. Singareni Collieries Co has mines in Andhra Pradesh State, and is jointly owned by the State and the Indian Governments

The MOU was signed by Carbon Energy’s executive general manager, Cliff Mallett, and S. Narsing Rao, the chairman and managing director of Singareni Collieries, following the Asia Pacific partnership for Clean Development and Climate (AP6) Coal Mining Taskforce workshop on underground coal gasification in Kolkata 12-15th November.

I hold MEE
 
Does anyone know of pending news or reason for 12.5% increase this morning in SP from 8 to 9 cents

Metex was rated with Excellent buy rating by Far East Capital's Warwick Grigor Oct 27

Australian Oct 27 2006
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.a...857-643,00.html

Uranium's glow waning, investors warned
Robin Bromby
27 October 2006

URANIUM investors beware: there aren't many bargains left in the sector.

This is the conclusion reached by Far East Capital's Warwick Grigor after he analysed more than 50 uranium stocks listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. The size of the known resource, the market capitalisation per pound of uranium in the ground and exploration results were all examined.

Stocks where there is still value to be found at present prices are pretty thin on the ground.

Top of the pile is Metex Resources, which has a uranium deposit in Italy, although Mr Grigor believes the resource needs to double in size to make it worth developing. But with Metex shares trading at 6.1c on Tuesday (the day on which all price calculations were based), the shares offered good upside.

"It is a cautiously and competently managed company that would be one of the lower risk ways to play the uranium market," the report says.
 
Metex SP has been outstanding for Dec rising from 8.2 to 13.5 cents or 64.6% for the month.

My prior posting Oct 29 reported:

Australian Oct 27 2006
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.a...857-643,00.html

Uranium's glow waning, investors warned
Robin Bromby
27 October 2006

Top of the pile is Metex Resources, which has a uranium deposit in Italy, although Mr Grigor believes the resource needs to double in size to make it worth developing. But with Metex shares trading at 6.1c on Tuesday (the day on which all price calculations were based), the shares offered good upside.

Metex was rated with Excellent buy rating by Far East Capital's Warwick Grigor Oct 27

URANIUM investors beware: there aren't many bargains left in the sector.

This is the conclusion reached by Far East Capital's Warwick Grigor after he analysed more than 50 uranium stocks listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. The size of the known resource, the market capitalisation per pound of uranium in the ground and exploration results were all examined.

Stocks where there is still value to be found at present prices are pretty thin on the ground.

"It is a cautiously and competently managed company that would be one of the lower risk ways to play the uranium market," the report says.
 
ASX ann
MEE 5:15 PM One for Five Non-Renounceable Rights Issue - Announced
http://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/showAnnouncementPDF.do?idsID=00696487

Metex Resources Ltd ("Metex") is pleased to announce a one (1) for five (5) non-renounceable rights issue to shareholders at 12 cents per share to raise up to approximately $5.4 million.

The purpose of this issue is to provide additional working capital to fund the exploration of the uranium initiative, development of the investment in the CSIRO UCG Joint Venture (Carbon Energy Pty Ltd) and ongoing gold exploration.

The issue will be non-renounceable, and shareholders will be invited to apply for additional Topup Shares beyond their entitlement, subject to allocation by the Directors.

Record Date to determine Entitlements under the Offer 9 March 2007

Opening Date and Dispatch of Prospectus and Acceptance forms 13 March 2007

Closing Date of Entitlements Issue for acceptance and payment of
subscription price 27 March 2007

Anticipated date for quotation of New Shares on a Deferred Settlement basis 28 March 2007

Notification to ASX of any Shortfall 30 March 2007

Expected date of despatch of Holding Statements 4 April 2007
 
ASX ann March 12

MEE 11:28 AM Grant of additional exploration licences in South Australia
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20070312/pdf/311dy6723xr41w.pdf

GRANT OF ADDITIONAL EXPLORATION LICENCES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA, TOGETHER WITH ENCOURAGING RESULTS OF UP TO 1400PPM (0.14%) U3O8 RETURNED FROM PREVIOUS EXPLORATION ON EL3672 (BROOKER).

Metex Resources Ltd (ASX:MEE) has been advised by Primary Industries and Resources SA (PIRSA) that the additional 3 applications for exploration licences in South Australia have now been granted. These are Mannahill (EL3708), Eringa (EL3709) and Goode Hill (EL3710) respectively. The Company
now has a total of 10 granted Exploration Licences in the State covering ground prospective for both iron oxide copper-gold-uranium (IOCG) and uranium in Cainozoic palaeochannel sequences

A review of all available public domain exploration data over these tenements is producing encouraging results from previous programs completed by companies exploring for uranium during the last period of significant uranium exploration activity in the early 1980’s.

At the Brooker Project (EL3672) on the Eyre Peninsular (west of Port Neill on Spencer Gulf), previous exploration had been undertaken by significant uranium exploration companies at the time including Pancontinental Mining Ltd (Pancontinental), Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation (PNC) and Afmeco Pty Ltd (AFMECO). The target at the time was uranium within the Lower Proterozoic gneisses and schists of the Hutchison Group. Outcrop of these prospective units is generally confined to the coastal strip along Spencer Gulf. Within the tenement the development of extensive sand dunes conceal the extent of the prospective lithologies.

Work completed in 1979 over part of the ground now covered by EL3672 included airborne magnetics, radiometrics, water sampling, and rock chip sampling. A number of significant radiometric anomalies were defined and “ground truthed” with field inspections. 91 locations were sampled testing some of the radiometric anomalies; however the majority of the sites either within or close to the current exploration licence (EL3672) remained unchecked. Rock chips from the sampled sites were assayed for U, Th, Cu, Ni, Zn, Pb, Co and Mn. Significant results were returned from an area close to the locality of Moreenia, west of Ungarra, with results ranging up to 1400ppm (0.14% U3O8) and 200ppm Th (Thorium) (Figure 2). The results were returned from outcropping weathered and altered gneiss and pegmatite of the Moody Suite. Follow up sampling confirmed the anomalous results. Following the completion of these programs no further work was completed, and the previous tenements were allowed to lapse.

The occurrence is consistent with a bedrock source for the uranium mineralization. Follow up ground geophysics and further rock chip sampling is scheduled to commence in April as a precursor to delineating suitable drilling targets.
 
Still good - see my post (set out below): Mee is an excellent buy. It has (i) potential gold resources of 880.000 ounces, ie about AU$750 mil, (ii) the CSIRO joint venture with a good trial coal field and (iii) now has over 20 uranium licences, including one which was prospected in the 70/80s by Total (the French energy giant) with a U3o8 rating of .33% from a very limited bore sample. That is a significant percentage of uranium and also of total resources compared to some of the much higher cap (AU$100-150 mil) unproven AU uranium companies.

Its (ivth) venture is its Italian mine, which is easily accessed and its uranium value (2.3mil lbs) is about US$230mil, however there are signficiant environmental opposition issues. They are being worked on I understand but my not be easliy overcome, at least not without a JV. However, Mee has engaged a highly experienced Italian expert to assist. I think it is a longer term project and am no so confident of its fruition in the short term. However, it adds speculative value and potentially European takeover interest.

Mee has a market cap of about AU$29 mil, being less than 3-6 times that of other, much lesser, stocks. Several pay for research uranium experts recommend it highly. I suspect that the difficulty is that it does not actively market itself as a uranium play, and thus misses the speculative buyers. However, I understand that it is considering a rebranding later this year, or splitting its uranium business, with preferences to existing shareholders. Further, it has the uranium potential with a solid backup interest in gold and coal gasification. It thus has less downside risk than many uranium plays.

I disclose reasonable long term interests (2010-2014) in Mee (acquired at AU$.13) and Cameco (acquired at US$39 and payng a minor dividend), my only junior and senior uranium and gold plays respectively. The time frame reflects the IAEE survey as to when uranium prices are likely to reduce to the US$60-70 range. Gold prices are speculative and of course will depend on the US$ amongst other things, and little weight is placed on those in the long term, given its significant fluctuation over the past 6 years. I note that my comments stem in part from concern that many will be burnt from pure speculation without considering long terms fundamentals. Best wishes to all. :)
 
Thanks for the good summary james99.

Promising news out today from the completed airborne EM on their Nyang Project in the Carnavon Basin. However one would think that they will need some drill results before there is any great movement in the shareprice. Promising all the same...
 
Agreed. An announcement as to a positive method of surveying with no data is of little use. However, it does show that Mee understands the importance of good uranium in today's speculative and longer term market and that it is focusing on that. I am quite positive about the Total block - it was a company wth significant expertise when it selected that area.

I suspect that with the announced US Uranium futures market and the increasing number of uranium IPO's it will become even more difficult to decide on relatively limited stock that provide a balance of limited risk and high potential reward.

Even when that can be done, the markets can often result in obtuse pricings. Cameco, for example (one of my holdings) still has US$100 bil of uranium reserves, and is still the largest producer despite the Cigar lake fiasco, and is buffeted by gold and electricity interests, yet its market cap is only approx US$10 bil. That is a low market cap, compared to Pdn, especially when regard is had to the Pdn reserves and production, and ridiculously low when compared to some Uranium plays who have no production and at best can be described as junior entry level explorers who may be a takeover target in a year or two, with none of the regulatory or mining expertise required to achieve production.

I do not intend to denigrate from Pdn - I do not have holdings but I think that it is is a company with excellent fundamentals and potential. As will be SXR One (with its new proposed struture) and its listing on the LSE. Instead, my issue is that the pricings are out of alignment and we all have an interest in having a stable uranium sharemarket because it may only take a few failures to result in a substantial price correction for all. Best wishes.
 
Re: MEE - Metex Resources Rising >10%

Dink. I see that Mee rose 11 % today. I understand that a rebranding may be in process. It will be interesting to see progress.:)
 
James,

Looking forward to Thursday

The volume was great today including large parcels and SP was up 2 cents.
-- todays volume 9,062,298 shares was the second highest trade for the past 12 months where on 2-Jan-07 10,565,457 shares were traded.
-- there were large parcels were traded in the last 100 minutes including at 14:25:04 1,000,000 @ $0.145 $145,000.00 XT

MEE $0.15 +$0.02 +15.38 9,062,298 share $1,299,526 24-Apr 16:10:59

Date ----- Close Volume
24-Apr-07 0.150 9,062,298
23-Apr-07 0.130 727,320
20-Apr-07 0.125 540,400
19-Apr-07 0.120 309,274
18-Apr-07 0.125 511,146
17-Apr-07 0.130 693,126
16-Apr-07 0.125 875,265
13-Apr-07 0.130 5,814,635
12-Apr-07 0.115 0
 
Cheers Bigdog. I agree, good volumes, especially in a day in which the overall market was generally flat. Thanks for those. The moving average is now also showing a clear uptrend. My purely personal feeling is that it suffers from underperformace of about three months compared to other stocks and, if so, then there is a substantial way to go (minor price fluctuations aside).
 
Good volume and happy with the general trend. Does anyone know what the upside the underground coal gasification will have in terms of the shareprice? I have done some research into the technology but cannot find any information on the economics of the process. I know it can be easy to focus on their uranium prospects but with the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments being very much pro clean coal technology could this aspect be being missed?
 
Dink. Not sure if this helps, but differing forms of gasification have been used overseas sucessfully. However, I understand that the CSIRO / Mee technology is at the intial trial stage and anticpate that details of the trial process to be conducted will be provided in the not too distant future. From trial (if successful) to commercialistion is likely a lengthy time frame, however CSIRO have an excellent reputation in this area, and the Mee personnel have considerable long term skill and credibility. Government support must be a possiblity given the currrent climate (no pun intended).

The technology, if successful, has the potential to be used / licenced worldwide. Russia, NZ, Australia, Europe and Amercia, for example, have substantial tracts of coal seams and the project is aimed at extraction such that there will be 40-45% less greenhouse emission.

My feeling is that it is a very substantial plank of the company, with potential if successful to add many multiples to the share price. Tt would be entirely possible for an international coal / gas / oil company to pay near to Au$1 bill. to buy the company and its technology (which would be a 30 times increase in share price).

However, before an international company was to explore that then it would want to have had the trials undertaken, and done so sucessfully, audited to an appropriate level, and to result in a technology which was easily replicated, cost effective and meet regulatory requirements in other countries. That is why I think that the process is longer (2-5 years) not short term.

Hence, also, one of the reasons why I have taken a long term position. The company's three strings to its bow (gold, coal gas and uranium) and long term viability (it has existed sucessfully for many years) appeal. Added to that, the directors have options at share prices in some case higher then the current price (some options are 20c). All too often directors grant options at very low cost and in such quantity that the dilution effect is very substantial. Mee's approach speaks of a conservative and shareholder focussed board. Additionally, ANZ Nominees have an almost 12% interest, and tend to take a well researched approach to any investment.:)
 
Dink

A good day.5.2 million shares and closed at 15c. Perhaps it is finally being recognised as relatively undervalued. Its moving average is showing a clear upward trend. :)
 
Very good day. Not sure what the stimulus is. Quite possibly it is simply just some seeing how undervalued this stock is.

I have also noticed that there has been a lot of media regarding funding in queensland for clean coal technologies. Unfortunately I believe this may be aimed at IGCC projects rather than UCG. ZeroGen has been getting some bad press and Beattie states that ZeroGen would be abandoned in favour of a better project. Ian MacFarlane (federal industry minister) has stated that there are better projects in the mix that may deserve funding. Now I don't know enough about this technology or the other companies that are in the process of developing such technology to speculate which companies might be in line to get some government funding but any company that receives a little backing will probably see a corresponding rise it its shareprice.

James99 do you know any other companies which are publicly listed and might be in line to receive such funding?

All just speculation at this stage. Regardless of the stimulus I'm not complaining. Good shareprice trend but more importantly very good volumes. Lets hope it keeps up over the ensuing days and doesn't retreat as it has in the past.

By the way, thankyou for the summary on the possible upside for Metex from their exposure to UCG technology with the CSIRO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top